ArticleCureus2024
BSG Isoform 2 (ENST00000353555) Is a Better Component Than Total BSG Expression in Generating Prognostic Signature for Overall Survival of Liver Cancer.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The pleiotropic roles of non-hormonal receptor basigin and regulatory microRNAs in breast cancer.NPJ breast cancer · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe basigin (BSG) gene, also known as CD147, has been implicated in the progression and prognosis of various cancers, including liver cancer. This study aimed to comprehensively evaluate the prognostic value of total BSG expression and its specific transcript variants, ENST00000353555 and ENST00000545507, in a large cohort of patients with primary liver cancer. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe prognostic values of total BSG, ENST00000353555, and ENST00000545507 expression in overall survival (OS) and progression-free interval (PFI) of patients with primary liver cancer were assessed using The Cancer Genome Atlas Liver Hepatocellular Carcinoma (TCGA-LIHC) dataset. Survival analysis, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, and validation of an extracellular matrix (ECM)-related prognostic signature were performed.
resultsIn univariate and multivariate analyses, total BSG, ENST00000353555, and ENST00000545507 expression were associated with poor OS in liver cancer patients. ENST00000353555 showed the highest hazard ratio among the three prognostic indicators. ROC analysis revealed that ENST00000353555 had better prognostic performance than total BSG expression. Replacing total BSG with ENST00000353555 in an existing ECM-related prognostic signature marginally increased the area under the curve values for one year from 0.79 to 0.80, and five-year OS from 0.72 to 0.73. ENST00000353555 showed isoform-specific positive correlations with EDNRB, IL10, C10orf54, and VEGFA.
conclusionsENST00000353555 serves as a better prognostic biomarker than total BSG expression in liver cancer, either as an individual marker or as a component of an ECM-related gene signature. Additionally, ENST00000353555 exhibited isoform-specific positive correlations with several immunosuppressive genes, suggesting a potential role in regulating the tumor microenvironment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.