ArticleCureus2024
More Is Actually Less: Practitioners' Perspective of Unnecessary Medical Testing in Saudi Arabian Emergency Departments.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background The overuse of medical testing, be it ancillary testing or imaging, has been identified as a problem in all healthcare systems in the world. As the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia marches towards the 2030 vision of healthcare transformation, we have sought to get a perspective on medically unnecessary tests being conducted in Saudi Arabian emergency departments (EDs), the reasons behind this phenomenon, and possible solutions to it. Methods This is a cross-sectional survey among emergency medicine physicians (EMPs) working in Saudi Arabian EDs, taken through a self-filled online questionnaire, about their ordering habits, what they believe to be unnecessary testing in their practice, the practice of their colleagues, and other Saudi EMPs as a whole. Subjects have also been asked about the reasons why such practices are occurring and possible solutions to reduce such overuse of unnecessary tests in Saudi EDs. Results A total of 182 EMPs were surveyed from the different regions of the Kingdom, and CT head for patients presenting with asymptomatic stroke, and asymptomatic TBI were the most overused scans (both 44%). The most overused advanced body imaging was CT kidney-ureters-bladder (KUB) at 41.5%, while the most overused ancillary tests were complete blood count (CBC) and liver transaminases. The most common reason for the practice was found to be fear of medicolegal proceedings (70.9%). Continuous education of EMPs and increasing ED staffing were found to be the most helpful solutions to reduce unnecessary testing in the ED (70.9% and 67%, respectively). Conclusion It is clear from our data that overuse of medical tests and imaging is still a prominent practice. CT head in asymptomatic patients seems to be the most commonly overused imaging in Saudi EDs. Ancillary testing and unnecessary ordering of CBCs and transaminases seem to stem from fear of EMPs from legal consequences. More control over medical test ordering needs to be exercised to reduce these practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.