Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39006625›Full record

ReviewCureus2024

Incidental Extracardiac Findings of Technetium-99m Pyrophosphate Scintigraphy: A Pictorial Review.

Ahmed L Fathala

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ahmed L FathalaRadiology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, SAU.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Technetium-99m pyrophosphate (Tc-99m PYP) cardiac imaging is a simple, widely available, noninvasive method to identify patients with transthyretin-type cardiac amyloidosis (ATTR), and it has remarkably high diagnostic accuracy with very high sensitivity and specificity. Visual scores of 0, 1, 2, and 3 indicate non-myocardial uptake, uptake less than rib, equal to rib, and greater than rib uptake, respectively. Semiquantitative assessment using the heart-to-contralateral lung ratio of more than 1.5 at 1 hour accurately distinguishes ATTR from the cardiac amyloid light chain subtype. However, there are several incidental non-cardiac findings that can be seen in planar images, rotating single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) images, maximum intensity projection images, or computed tomography images acquired for attenuation correction. These findings may lead to the early detection of a noncardiac condition that may require additional treatment. The intent of this review is to demonstrate several incidental noncardiac abnormalities that have an impact on patient management and follow-up.

Indexed as

cardiac amyloidosisincidental noncardiac findingsnuclear cardiologyplanar imagingspecttc-99m pyp imaging

Identifiers

PMID39006625
PMCPMC11246189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.