ArticleCureus2024
Neck Computed Tomography Measurements Associated With Cardiovascular Risk Factors.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Neck adiposity has been related to cardiovascular risk in healthy and nonhealthy individuals. Our objective was to evaluate the utility of anatomic neck measurements extracted from computed tomography (CT) examinations as a predictor of cardiovascular disease and its risk factors. Methods We investigated patients who had a CT neck examination with intravenous contrast performed at two hospitals between 2013 and 2020. Patients with a neck malignancy, prior neck surgery, age <18 years, incomplete demographic information, and inadequate image quality were excluded. We performed 18 separate measurements of neck anatomy which were correlated with cardiovascular risk factors and disease, as well as relevant lab values and medications. All multivariable linear regressions were controlled for gender and BMI. Associations with p<0.05 were considered statistically significant. The measurements were then used to predict hypertension using random forest, a non-linear prediction algorithm. Results Approximately 20,000 neck CT examinations with contrast were performed between 2013-2020. After applying the inclusion criteria, 458 patients remained in the study population. Eight measurements (all of which include a component of neck adiposity) showed a statistically significant association between anatomic measurements and cardiovascular risk factors. The risk factor most often associated with increases in CT measurements was type 2 diabetes. Accordingly, patients on insulin treatment had a significantly higher average for all eight measurements. Significant measurement increases were also found in those previously diagnosed with hyperlipidemia and in those being treated with hypertension medications. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) value of the random forest prediction algorithm was 0.68, meaning our measurements were a good predictor of hypertensive disease status. Conclusion Adipose tissue measurements extracted from CT examinations of the neck are associated with cardiovascular risk factors including hypertension, diabetes, and hyperlipidemia. Machine learning models of anatomic neck measurements can potentially identify patients at risk for cardiovascular disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.