ArticleCureus2024
Genetic Profiling and Survival Outcomes in Romanian Colorectal Cancer Patients.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- KRAS Mutation Status in Relation to Clinicopathological Characteristics of Romanian Colorectal Cancer Patients.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe increasing incidence of colorectal cancer is one of the most frequently addressed medical topics worldwide. It represents the third most commonly diagnosed cancer in both men and women globally, with significant implications for public health. Mortality for this type of malignancy remains high, second only to lung cancer. Given their clinical relevance, the identification and understanding of KRAS and BRAF mutations have become crucial components of personalized medicine approaches in colorectal cancer. Hence, our desire is to carry out a research that analyzes the impact of these mutations in terms of survival and mortality on patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective study spanning from 2018 to 2022, which involved 118 patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer. The patients were selected from the databases of the Oradea County Emergency Clinical Hospital and Pelican Oradea Hospital. Genetic testing was performed at the "Resident Laboratory" clinic. Subsequently, patients were divided into two groups of equal size based on the presence or absence of mutations.
resultsThe survival rate one year after the diagnosis of colorectal cancer is 84.74% (N=50/59) for the mutant group versus 67.96% (N=40/59) for the wild-type group. The survival rate at five years from the diagnosis of colorectal cancer is 25.93% (N=15/59) for patients with wild-type tumors compared to 33.54% (N=20/59) for patients with tumors with mutant status (p=0.483, HR=1.153, CI 95% 0.7661-1.735). The five-year survival rate, depending on the mutation present, highlights the fact that the average overall survival for those with the KRAS mutation is 38.6 months (CI 95% 35.22-41.97) and for those with the BRAF mutation is 8.3 months (CI 95% 5.42-11.17) (p=0.039). The mortality rate for mutant KRAS is 44.89% (N=22/50), while for those with mutant BRAF, it is 100% (N=6/6).
conclusionsWe observed no statistically significant difference in overall survival rate and disease-free interval between the two studied groups, but the overall survival was better for those with mutations present (38.64 months versus 31.07 months for wild-type tumors). The mortality rate is higher among tumors with wild-type status (p=0.005), in the first year after the diagnosis of colorectal cancer. The BRAF mutation confers a much worse prognosis than the KRAS mutation, from both the survival analysis and the mortality rate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.