ArticleCureus2024
Combined Endovascular Repair of a Giant Symptomatic Hepatic Aneurysm: A Case Report and Comprehensive Literature Review.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Endovascular repair of a common hepatic artery aneurysm using overlapping self-expanding covered stent grafts.Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques · 2026Article
- Article
- Endovascular treatment of a giant aneurysm of the proper hepatic artery: A case report.Radiology case reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hepatic artery aneurysms (HAAs) are an uncommon vascular disease, which account for 20% of visceral artery aneurysms. The majority are usually asymptomatic and discovered accidentally during imaging control, but occasionally, they can present as acute abdominal pain, haemobilia, obstructive jaundice, or gastrointestinal bleeding due to aneurysm sac expansion or rupture with catastrophic consequences. We present the case of a 51-year-old male patient with a giant common HAA of 11.1 cm who was managed endovascularly. A combined endovascular approach was decided due to the anatomy of the aneurysm. Endovascular embolization with coils in the distal part of the aneurysm and deployment of a stent graft proximally to exclude inflow were used. At six months, the aneurysm size was regressed at 5 cm; however, seven months after the operation, the patient presented with pylorus perforation due to coil migration which was managed by coil removal, peripheral gastrectomy, and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. We provide a narrative literature review regarding the endovascular repair of giant HAAs. The PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases were searched for articles up to January 2024. Thirty-eight studies (case reports, case series) were retrieved. The conclusion is that giant HAAs are a rare and severe condition in which their treatment can be challenging with unexpected adverse events. The literature review suggests that the endovascular approach whenever feasible is a safe and effective treatment option with low morbidity and mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.