Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39006473›Full record

ArticleMolecular and clinical oncology2024

Dosimetric comparison of nodal clinical target volume for locally advanced non‑small cell lung cancer: Options for geometric expansion vs. lymph node stations.

Shigeo Takahashi, Masahide Anada, Toshifumi Kinoshita, Takamasa Nishide, Toru Shibata

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular and clinical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shigeo TakahashiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Kagawa University Hospital, Miki, Kagawa 761-0793, Japan.
Masahide AnadaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Kagawa University Hospital, Miki, Kagawa 761-0793, Japan.
Toshifumi KinoshitaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Kagawa University Hospital, Miki, Kagawa 761-0793, Japan.
Takamasa NishideDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Kagawa University Hospital, Miki, Kagawa 761-0793, Japan.
Toru ShibataDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Kagawa University Hospital, Miki, Kagawa 761-0793, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of the present retrospective study was to evaluate whether dosimetric differences existed in nodal clinical target volume (CTV) using options for geometric expansion and lymph node (LN) stations based on the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology guideline for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In the treatment planning computed tomographic images of 17 patients with cT4N2M0 NSCLC, nodal CTVs were contoured based on the guideline options of: i) Geometric expansion, with CTV including the nodal gross tumor volume plus 5 mm margin; and ii) LN stations, with CTV including the affected LN stations. Treatment planning of 60 Gy in 30 fractions was performed using volumetric modulated arc therapy; D

Indexed as

intensity-modulated radiotherapyinvolved-field irradiationradiation therapyselective nodal irradiationvolumetric modulated arc therapy

Identifiers

PMID39006473
PMCPMC11240866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.