ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2024
Enhancing the therapeutic efficacy of gefitinib on subcutaneously transplanted SKOV3 ovarian cancer tumors in nude mice via ultrasound‑stimulated microbubble cavitation.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advances in Ultrasound-Targeted Microbubble Destruction (UTMD) for Breast Cancer Therapy.International journal of nanomedicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present study aimed to explore the effect of ultrasound-stimulated microbubble cavitation (USMC) on drug concentration and therapeutic efficacy of oral gefitinib in treating subcutaneously transplanted SKOV3 ovarian cancer tumors in nude mice. The present study employed the VINNO70 ultrasonic diagnostic and treatment integrated machine for USMC therapy. Firstly, the mechanical index was set at 0.25, and the therapeutic efficacy of USMC treatment was assessed at intervals of 5, 10 and 20 min. Briefly, 72 nude mice were randomized into the following four groups (n=18/group): Control group, USMC
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.