ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2024
Diffusion model enables quantitative CBF analysis of Alzheimer's Disease.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objectives: Cerebral blood flow (CBF) measured by arterial spin labeling (ASL) is a promising biomarker for Alzheimer's Disease (AD). ASL data from multiple vendors were included in the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) dataset. However, the M0 images were missing in Siemens ASL data, prohibiting CBF quantification. Here, we utilized a generative diffusion model to impute the missing M0 and validated generated CBF data with acquired data from GE. Methods: A conditional latent diffusion model was trained to generate the M0 image and validate it on an in-house dataset ( Results: The trained diffusion model generated the M0 image with high fidelity (Structural similarity index, SSIM=0.924±0.019; peak signal-to-noise ratio, PSNR=33.348±1.831) and caused minimal bias in CBF values (mean difference in whole brain is 1.07±2.12ml/100g/min). Both generated and acquired CBF data showed similar differentiation patterns by AD stages, similar classification performance, and decreasing slopes with AD progression in specific AD-related regions. Generated CBF data also improved accuracy in classifying AD stages compared to qualitative perfusion data. Interpretation/Conclusion: This study shows the potential of diffusion models for imputing missing modalities for large-scale studies of CBF variation with AD.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.