Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39006293›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2024

Quantitative ultrasound imaging parameters in patients with cancerous thyroid nodules: development of a diagnostic model.

Mingyang Liu, Na Pan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of translational research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mingyang LiuDepartment of Ultrasound, Xingtai People's Hospital No. 16 Hongxing Street, Xingtai 054500, Hebei, China.
Na PanDepartment of Hematology, Xingtai People's Hospital No. 16 Hongxing Street, Xingtai 054500, Hebei, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to develop a diagnostic model utilizing quantitative ultrasound parameters to accurately differentiate benign from malignant thyroid nodules.

methodsA retrospective analysis of 194 patients with thyroid nodules, encompassing 65 malignant and 129 benign cases, was performed. Clinical data, ultrasound characteristics, and hemodynamic indicators were compared. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and logistic regression analysis identified independent diagnostic markers.

resultsNo significant differences in clinical data were observed between the groups (P>0.05). Malignant nodules, however, were more likely to exhibit solid composition, hypoechoicity, irregular shapes, calcifications, central blood flow, and unclear margins (P<0.05). Hemodynamic parameters showed that malignant nodules had lower end-diastolic volume (EDV) but higher peak systolic velocity (PSV), resistive index (RI), and vascularization flow index (VFI) (P<0.001). Independent diagnostic factors identified included calcification, margin definition, RI, and VFI. A risk prediction model was formulated, demonstrating significantly lower scores for benign nodules (P<0.0001), achieving an ROC area of 0.964.

conclusionColor Doppler ultrasound effectively distinguishes malignant from benign thyroid nodules. The diagnostic model emphasizes the importance of calcification, margin clarity, RI, and VFI as critical elements, enhancing the accuracy of thyroid nodule characterization and facilitating informed clinical decisions.

Indexed as

Color Doppler ultrasounddiagnostic modelhemodynamicsquantitative imaging parametersthyroid nodules

Identifiers

PMID39006293
PMCPMC11236663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.