ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2024
Preoperative application of CT and MRI registration in lumbar disc herniation endoscopic surgery could improve the postoperative rehabilitation of patients.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPercutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy (PELD) has emerged as routine treatment for lumbar disc herniation (LDH) due to its minimal invasiveness and quick recovery. However, PELD demands high precision from the surgeon, as the risk of intraoperative complications is substantial, including potential damage to the nerve root and dura, and a higher likelihood of recurrence post-surgery. Thus, preoperative planning utilizing CT and MRI imaging is essential.
methodsIn this study, the clinical data of 140 patients treated with PELD for LDH from January 2021 to December 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were categorized into two groups based on whether CT and MRI registration (CMR) was employed for surgical planning: a CMR group (n=68) and a control group (n=72). Data collected included surgery time, hospital stay duration, and scores from the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for low back and leg pain, as well as the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Lumbar Spine Score (JOA). Differences between the two groups were assessed using the Student's t-test.
resultsNo significant difference was found in hospital stay length between the groups (P=0.277). Surgery time was significantly shorter in the CMR group (P<0.001). Prior to surgery, no significant differences in VAS scores for leg and low back pain were observed between the groups (P=0.341 and P=0.131, respectively); however, at 2 months postoperatively, both scores were significantly lower in the CMR group (P<0.001 and P=0.002, respectively). Similarly, no difference in preoperative JOA scores was noted (P=0.750), but at 2 months postoperative, the CMR group exhibited significantly higher scores (P<0.001).
conclusionCompared with the traditional PELD, the preoperative use of CMR has shown to reduce surgery time, alleviate leg and low back pain, and increase the lumbar JOA score at 2 months after surgery, underscoring its efficacy in enhancing surgical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.