Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39006120›Full record

ArticleArchives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation2024

Insights on Telecommunication Use by Rehabilitation Therapists Before, During, and Beyond COVID-19.

Michael J Sobrepera, Julie Elfishawy, Anh T Nguyen, Laura P Prosser, Michelle J Johnson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Michael J SobreperaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and Applied Mechanics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Julie ElfishawyDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Anh T NguyenDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Laura P ProsserDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Pennsylvania, PA.
Michelle J JohnsonDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and Applied Mechanics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To determine if the use of telerehabilitation among rehabilitation therapists during the first 11 months of the COVID-19 pandemic increased, if therapists' identified plans to continue use after the pandemic, and to understand challenges that therapists face in using telerehabilitation, and to evaluate viable use-cases for telerehabilitation. Design: A survey was conducted among clinicians containing questions about tools being used before, during, and after (planned) COVID-19. Statistical analysis was conducted to evaluate the increase in actual usage of telerehabilitation during the pandemic and planned usage after the pandemic. Setting: The study was survey-based and conducted remotely via online distribution. Participants: 387 participants (90.2% women) with an average age of 40.1 years participated in the survey and satisfied selection criteria. On average, they practiced for 14.8 years. Main Outcome Measures: No interventions were made. Survey item results were used for analysis. Results: Therapists used telerehabilitation more frequently during COVID-19 as compared with before COVID-19. Therapist use of video calls more than tripled (288.89% increase) during COVID-19. Speech therapists were far more likely to adopt telerehabilitation than physical therapists or occupational therapists. 18.9% of therapists planned to use video-based remote communication with patients after COVID-19. 31% of therapists who had not previously used telerehabilitation prior to the pandemic anticipated using it post-pandemic. Most therapists (88%) believed that discussion-based activities could be done remotely. Conclusions: COVID-19 has affected the way therapists interact with patients. These changes may have lasting effect on patient interactions and a perceived potential for future use of telerehabilitation is evident. Therapists who had already made use of remote communication had more optimistic outlooks on the future utility of these mediums, indicating that exposure favors future use. Therapists anticipate a potential increase in utilization of Video-Based Telerehabilitation post-pandemic but have faced and expect to face challenges in use of telerehabilitation. While disparities and obstacles to access pose challenges, the progress made during COVID-19 is promising.

Indexed as

COVID-19RehabilitationTelemedicineTele-rehabilitationTherapy

Identifiers

PMID39006120
PMCPMC11239978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.