Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39006110›Full record

ArticleArchives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation2024

Adapting the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite for Telehealth Administration Using Videoconference Delivery: Methodological Considerations and Interrater Reliability.

Toni Van Denend, Virgil Mathiowetz, Katharine Preissner, Francois Bethoux, Marcia Finlayson, Tanya Packer, Setareh Ghahari, Matthew Plow

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Toni Van DenendDepartment of Occupational Therapy, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL.
Virgil MathiowetzProgram in Occupational Therapy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
Katharine PreissnerDepartment of Occupational Therapy, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL.
Francois BethouxDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Neurological Institute, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH.
Marcia FinlaysonSchool of Rehabilitation Therapy, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Tanya PackerSchool of Occupational Therapy and School of Health Administration, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Setareh GhahariSchool of Rehabilitation Therapy, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Matthew PlowFrances Payne Bolton School of Nursing, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To describe the adaptations made and to examine interrater reliability and feasibility of administering a telehealth version of the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (tele-MSFC). Design: The Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC) is a commonly used, in-person clinical outcome assessment. It is composed of the timed 25-Foot Walk Test (T25FWT), Nine-Hole Peg Test (NHPT), and Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT). The MSFC was adapted for videoconference administration as part of a larger clinical trial. One of the adaptations included administering a timed 12.5-Foot Walk Test (T12.5FWT) for participants who did not have adequate space in their homes for the T25FWT. Participants, examiners, and raters completed surveys online about their satisfaction and experience with tele-MSFC. Setting: Participants underwent the tele-MSFC in their homes using a laptop or smartphone while examiners scored the tele-MSFC in real-time at a remote location. Participants: Community-dwelling adults (n=61) with mild-to-moderate multiple sclerosis (MS) symptoms. Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measure: Tele-MSFC. Results: Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) assessed interrater reliability between the examiner and 2 independent raters who later scored a recording of the tele-MSFC. Interrater reliability was excellent (ICC>0.90) for all tests, including the T12.5FWT. Participants were highly satisfied with tele-MSFC. However, challenges included adequate space for T25FWT, technical difficulties, and safety and privacy considerations of individuals with moderate impairments who were requested to have their caregivers present during testing. Conclusion: The tele-MSFC is reliable and feasible to administer with adaptations for community-dwelling adults with mild to moderate MS symptoms. Further validation of T12.5FWT is needed.

Indexed as

Disability evaluationPatient outcome assessmentTelemedicineTelerehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID39006110
PMCPMC11240042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.