Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39006109›Full record

ArticleArchives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation2024

An International and Multidisciplinary Consensus on the Labeling of Spatial Neglect Using a Modified Delphi Method.

Timothy J Rich, Lindy J Williams, Audrey Bowen, Gail A Eskes, Kimberly Hreha, Matthew Checketts, Mauro Mancuso, Helena Fordell, Peii Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Timothy J RichCenter for Stroke Rehabilitation Research, Kessler Foundation, West Orange, NJ, United States.
Lindy J WilliamsAllied Health and Human Performance Academic Unit, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Audrey BowenManchester Centre for Health Psychology, and the Geoffrey Jefferson Brain Research Centre, University of Manchester, Salford, United Kingdom.
Gail A EskesDepartments of Psychiatry and Psychology & Neuroscience, Life Sciences Centre - Oceanography, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Kimberly HrehaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Occupational Therapy Doctorate Division, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States.
Matthew CheckettsGeoffrey Jefferson Brain Research Centre, The Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Northern Care Alliance & University of Manchester, Salford, United Kingdom.
Mauro MancusoPhysical and Rehabilitative Medicine Unit, Italian National Health Service Az-Azienda, USL, Tuscany, Italy.
Helena FordellDepartment of Clinical Science, Neurosciences, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Peii ChenCenter for Stroke Rehabilitation Research, Kessler Foundation, West Orange, NJ, United States.

Funding

Gaze, Head Rotation, and Neuroanatomic Correlates of Reading Errors in Neglect DyslexiaK01HD109446 · NICHD · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI Timothy John Rich · 2023 to 2026
$502k
NICHD NIH HHS K01 HD109446
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Survivors of neurologic injury (most commonly stroke or traumatic brain injury) frequently experience a disorder in which contralesionally positioned objects or the contralesional features of individual objects are often left unattended or underappreciated. The disorder is known by >200 unique labels in the literature, which potentially causes confusion for patients and their families, complicates literature searches for researchers and clinicians, and promotes a fractionated conceptualization of the disorder. The objective of this Delphi was to determine if consensus (≥75% agreement) could be reached by an international and multidisciplinary panel of researchers and clinicians with expertise on the topic. To accomplish this aim, we used a modified Delphi method in which 66 researchers and/or clinicians with expertise on the topic completed at least 1 of 4 iterative rounds of surveys. Per the Delphi method, panelists were provided with results from each round prior to responding to the survey in the subsequent round with the explicit intention of achieving consensus. The panel ultimately reached consensus that the disorder should be consistently labeled

Indexed as

ConsensusDelphi techniqueNeurologic rehabilitationPerceptual disordersRehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID39006109
PMCPMC11240031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.