Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39006007›Full record

ArticleEvolutionary applications2024

Epigenetic diversity of genes with copy number variations among natural populations of the three-spined stickleback.

Frédéric J J Chain, Britta S Meyer, Melanie J Heckwolf, Sören Franzenburg, Christophe Eizaguirre, Thorsten B H Reusch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolutionary applications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Frédéric J J ChainDepartment of Biological Sciences University of Massachusetts Lowell Lowell Massachusetts USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6169-7399
Britta S MeyerMarine Evolutionary Ecology GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel Kiel Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2549-1825
Melanie J HeckwolfMarine Evolutionary Ecology GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel Kiel Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7507-8895
Sören FranzenburgInstitute of Clinical Molecular Biology, Kiel University Kiel Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6374-4910
Christophe EizaguirreSchool of Biological and Behavioural Sciences Queen Mary University of London London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8673-7649
Thorsten B H ReuschMarine Evolutionary Ecology GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel Kiel Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8961-4337

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Duplicated genes provide the opportunity for evolutionary novelty and adaptive divergence. In many cases, having more gene copies increases gene expression, which might facilitate adaptation to stressful or novel environments. Conversely, overexpression or misexpression of duplicated genes can be detrimental and subject to negative selection. In this scenario, newly duplicate genes may evade purifying selection if they are epigenetically silenced, at least temporarily, leading them to persist in populations as copy number variations (CNVs). In animals and plants, younger gene duplicates tend to have higher levels of DNA methylation and lower levels of gene expression, suggesting epigenetic regulation could promote the retention of gene duplications via expression repression or silencing. Here, we test the hypothesis that DNA methylation variation coincides with young duplicate genes that are segregating as CNVs in six populations of the three-spined stickleback that span a salinity gradient from 4 to 30 PSU. Using reduced-representation bisulfite sequencing, we found DNA methylation and CNV differentiation outliers rarely overlapped. Whereas lineage-specific genes and young duplicates were found to be highly methylated, just two gene CNVs showed a significant association between promoter methylation level and copy number, suggesting that DNA methylation might not interact with CNVs in our dataset. If most new duplications are regulated for dosage by epigenetic mechanisms, our results do not support a strong contribution from DNA methylation soon after duplication. Instead, our results are consistent with a preference to duplicate genes that are already highly methylated.

Indexed as

adaptive differentiationcopy number variations (CNVs)DNA methylationepigenetic regulationgene duplicationstickleback

Identifiers

PMID39006007
PMCPMC11246597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.