Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39005985›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in public health2024

Effects of structured and unstructured interventions on fundamental motor skills in preschool children: a meta-analysis.

Delong Chen, Guanggao Zhao, Jinmei Fu, Sunli Shun, Liqiang Su, Zihao He, Ruiming Chen, Tianle Jiang, Xuewen Hu, Yunong Li and 1 more

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Delong ChenSchool of Physical Education, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Guanggao ZhaoSchool of Physical Education, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Jinmei FuJiangxi Sports Science and Medicine Center, Nanchang, China.
Sunli ShunJiangxi Sports Science and Medicine Center, Nanchang, China.
Liqiang SuPhysical Education College, Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang, China.
Zihao HeSchool of Sports and Human Sciences, Beijing Sport University, Beijing, China.
Ruiming ChenSchool of Physical Education, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Tianle JiangSchool of Physical Education, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Xuewen HuSchool of Physical Education, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Yunong LiSchool of Physical Education, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Fanchao ShenSchool of Physical Education, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: It has been suggested that higher levels of fundamental motor skills (FMS) promote the physical health of preschool-aged children. The impacts of structured and unstructured interventions on FMS in children aged 10-16 years have been widely acknowledged in previous studies. However, there is a lack of relevant studies in preschool-aged children. Objective: This meta-analysis aimed to compare the effects of structured and unstructured interventions on FMS in preschool-aged children. Methods: The PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases were searched from inception to 1 November 2023 to identify experiments describing structured and unstructured interventions for FMS in preschool-aged children. The Downs and Black Checklist was used to assess the risk of bias. A random effects model was used for the meta-analysis to evaluate the pooled effects of interventions on FMS. Subgroup analyses based on the duration and characteristics of the intervention were conducted to identify sources of heterogeneity. Results: A total of 23 studies with 4,068 participants were included. There were 12 studies examining structured interventions, 9 studies examining unstructured interventions, and 6 studies comparing structured vs. unstructured interventions. The risk of bias in the included studies was generally low. All interventions significantly improved FMS in preschool-aged children compared to control treatments ( Conclusion: Structured interventions play a crucial role in enhancing FMS among young children, especially when considering LMSs. These interventions require consistent and repeated practice over time to reach proficiency. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO, identifier number CRD42023475088, https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023475088.

Indexed as

Motor SkillsChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMalefundamental motor skillsmeta-analysispreschool childrenstructuredunstructured

Identifiers

PMID39005985
PMCPMC11242925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.