Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39005953›Full record

ArticleJournal of cognition2024

NewAbstractConcepts: A Database of 42 Normed Abstract Concepts and Exemplars.

Dounia Lakhzoum, Marie Izaute, Ludovic Ferrand, René Zeelenberg, Diane Pecher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cognition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dounia LakhzoumUniversité Clermont Auvergne, CNRS, LAPSCO, F-63001 Clermont-Ferrand, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3568-9261
Marie IzauteUniversité Clermont Auvergne, CNRS, LAPSCO, F-63001 Clermont-Ferrand, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8834-8455
Ludovic FerrandUniversité Clermont Auvergne, CNRS, LAPSCO, F-63001 Clermont-Ferrand, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1631-7849
René ZeelenbergDepartment of Psychology, Education, and Child Studies, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0745-3817
Diane PecherDepartment of Psychology, Education, and Child Studies, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0976-6080

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently, researchers have expressed challenges in conducting word-learning experiments in adult populations due to limited availability of normed stimulus materials. This constraint often prompts the use of low-frequency or low-prevalence words, introducing the potential influence of prior knowledge or direct translation to familiar words. In response, we developed novel abstract concepts devoid of word referents, providing better control over prior knowledge. These new concepts describe situations encountered in various settings for which there is no existing word in English. The resulting database comprises 42 normed New Abstract Concepts, offering unique materials structured through scenarios, each containing similar and dissimilar exemplars. These materials underwent meticulous norming for relatability and similarity levels across a series of studies. The success of our approach was demonstrated in a word-learning experiment examining the effects of similarity and diversity. The database serves as a valuable resource for selecting stimuli in experiments exploring the learning of abstract semantic concepts, particularly investigating the role of similarity versus diversity in concept learning. The database is available on OSF (https://osf.io/svm2p/).

Indexed as

abstract conceptabstractionconcept learningcontextual diversitygeneralization mechanismssimilarity

Identifiers

PMID39005953
PMCPMC11243765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.