Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39005857›Full record

ArticleInfection and drug resistance2024

Adequacy of the Dosing and Infusion Time of Ceftazidime/Avibactam for the Treatment of Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections: A PK/PD Simulation Study.

Yun Han, Jianping Zhu, Jieqiong Liu, Ying Zheng, Gang Liang, Yi Yang, Lingyan Yu, Zhenwei Yu, Gang Han

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection and drug resistance, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yun Han *Research Center for Clinical Pharmacy, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Jianping Zhu *Research Center for Clinical Pharmacy, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-6923-9584
Jieqiong LiuThe 903rd Hospital of PLA Joint Logistic Support Force, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-5171-6960
Ying ZhengThe 903rd Hospital of PLA Joint Logistic Support Force, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Gang LiangResearch Center for Clinical Pharmacy, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Yi YangResearch Center for Clinical Pharmacy, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Lingyan YuSecond Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Zhenwei YuResearch Center for Clinical Pharmacy, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-3776-2290
Gang HanResearch Center for Clinical Pharmacy, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Recent studies suggested the potential benefits of extended infusion times to optimize the treatment efficacy of ceftazidime/avibactam, which indicated that the current pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target may not be sufficient, especially for severe infections. The purpose of this study is to assess the adequacy of dosing strategies and infusion durations of ceftazidime/avibactam when applying higher PK/PD targets. Methods: This study utilized published PK parameters to conduct Monte Carlo simulations. Different dosages including the recommended regimen based on renal function were simulated and evaluated by the probability of target attainment (PTA) and cumulative fraction of response (CFR). Different PK/PD targets were set for ceftazidime and avibactam. MIC distributions from various sources were used to calculate the CFR. Results: Multiple PK/PD targets have been set in this study, All recommended dosage could easily achieve the target of 50% Conclusion: The current recommended dosing regimen of ceftazidime/avibactam is insufficient for severe infection patients, and continuous infusion is suggested.

Indexed as

avibactamceftazidimepharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamicprobability of target attainment

Identifiers

PMID39005857
PMCPMC11244631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.