Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39005801›Full record

ArticleACS omega2024

Development and Evaluation of Conformal Prediction Methods for Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship.

Yuting Xu, Andy Liaw, Robert P Sheridan, Vladimir Svetnik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Machine Learning of Band Gaps and Thermodynamic Stability in ANanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yuting XuEarly Development Statistics, Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, New Jersey 07065, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2091-3854
Andy LiawEarly Development Statistics, Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, New Jersey 07065, United States.
Robert P SheridanModeling and Informatics, Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, New Jersey 07033, United States.
Vladimir SvetnikEarly Development Statistics, Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, New Jersey 07065, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) regression model is a commonly used technique for predicting the biological activities of compounds using their molecular descriptors. Besides accurate activity estimation, obtaining a prediction uncertainty metric like a prediction interval is highly desirable. Quantifying prediction uncertainty is an active research area in statistical and machine learning (ML), but the implementation for QSAR remains challenging. However, most ML algorithms with high predictive performance require add-on companions for estimating the uncertainty of their prediction. Conformal prediction (CP) is a promising approach as its main components are agnostic to the prediction modes, and it produces valid prediction intervals under weak assumptions on the data distribution. We proposed computationally efficient CP algorithms tailored to the most widely used ML models, including random forests, deep neural networks, and gradient boosting. The algorithms use a novel approach to the derivation of nonconformity scores from the estimates of prediction uncertainty generated by the ensembles of point predictions. The validity and efficiency of proposed algorithms are demonstrated on a diverse collection of QSAR data sets as well as simulation studies. The provided software implementing our algorithms can be used as stand-alone or easily incorporated into other ML software packages for QSAR modeling.

Identifiers

PMID39005801
PMCPMC11238240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.