Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39005787›Full record

ReviewACS omega2024

Controlled Environment Ecosystem: A Cutting-Edge Technology in Speed Breeding.

Avinash Sharma, Mainu Hazarika, Punabati Heisnam, Himanshu Pandey, Vadakkumcheri Akathoottu Subrahmanian Nampoothiri Devadas, Ajith Kumar Kesavan, Praveen Kumar, Devendra Singh, Amit Vashishth, Rani Jha and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS omega, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Speed breeding in upland cotton (Frontiers in plant science · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Avinash SharmaFaculty of Agricultural Sciences, Arunachal University of Studies, Namsai, Arunachal Pradesh 792103, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3637-8729
Mainu HazarikaFaculty of Agricultural Sciences, Arunachal University of Studies, Namsai, Arunachal Pradesh 792103, India.
Punabati HeisnamCollege of Agriculture, Central Agricultural University, Iroisemba, Manipur 795004, India.
Himanshu PandeyPG Department of Agriculture, Khalsa College, Amritsar, Punjab 143002, India.
Vadakkumcheri Akathoottu Subrahmanian Nampoothiri DevadasSchool of Agricultural Sciences, Joy University, Thirunelveli, Tamil Nadu 627116, India.
Ajith Kumar KesavanFaculty of Agricultural Sciences, Arunachal University of Studies, Namsai, Arunachal Pradesh 792103, India.
Praveen KumarAgricultural Research Station, Agriculture University, Jodhpur, Rajasthan 342304, India.
Devendra SinghFaculty of Biotechnology, Shri Ramswaroop Memorial University, Barabanki, Uttar Pradesh 225003, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9795-5641
Amit VashishthPatanjali Herbal Research Department, Patanjali Research Institute, Haridwar, Uttarakhand 249405, India.
Rani JhaISBM University, Gariyaband, Chhattishgarh 493996, India.
Varucha MisraDivision of Crop Improvement, ICAR-Indian Institute of Sugarcane Research, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh 226002, India.
Rajeev KumarDivision of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, ICAR-Indian Institute of Sugarcane Research, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh 226002, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The controlled environment ecosystem is a meticulously designed plant growing chamber utilized for cultivating biofortified crops and microgreens, addressing hidden hunger and malnutrition prevalent in the growing population. The integration of speed breeding within such controlled environments effectively eradicates morphological disruptions encountered in traditional breeding methods such as inbreeding depression, male sterility, self-incompatibility, embryo abortion, and other unsuccessful attempts. In contrast to the unpredictable climate conditions that often prolong breeding cycles to 10-15 years in traditional breeding and 4-5 years in transgenic breeding within open ecosystems, speed breeding techniques expedite the achievement of breeding objectives and F1-F6 generations within 2-3 years under controlled growing conditions. In comparison, traditional breeding may take 5-10 years for plant population line creation, 3-5 years for field trials, and 1-2 years for variety release. The effectiveness of speed breeding in trait improvement and population line development varies across different crops, requiring approximately 4 generations in rice and groundnut, 5 generations in soybean, pea, and oat, 6 generations in sorghum,

Identifiers

PMID39005787
PMCPMC11238293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.