ArticleACS omega2024
Zinc-Modified Titanate Nanotubes as Radiosensitizers for Glioblastoma: Enhancing Radiotherapy Efficacy and Monte Carlo Simulations.
Article in ACS omega, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Current Perspectives on Radiosensitizers in Cancer Radiotherapy.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Radiotherapy (RT) is the established noninvasive treatment for glioblastoma (GBM), a highly aggressive malignancy. However, its effectiveness in improving patient survival remains limited due to the radioresistant nature of GBM. Metal-based nanostructures have emerged as promising strategies to enhance RT efficacy. Among them, titanate nanotubes (TNTs) have gained significant attention due to their biocompatibility and cost-effectiveness. This study aimed to synthesize zinc-modified TNTs (ZnTNT) from sodium TNTs (NaTNT), in addition to characterizing the formed nanostructures and evaluating their radiosensitization effects in GBM cells (U87 and U251). Hydrothermal synthesis was employed to fabricate the TNTs, which were characterized using various techniques, including transmission electron microscopy (TEM), energy-dispersive spectroscopy, scanning-transmission mode, Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy, ICP-MS (inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, and zeta potential analysis. Cytotoxicity was evaluated in healthy (Vero) and GBM (U87 and U251) cells by the MTT assay, while the internalization of TNTs was observed through TEM imaging and ICP-MS. The radiosensitivity of ZnTNT and NaTNT combined with 5 Gy was evaluated using clonogenic assays. Monte Carlo simulations using the MCNP6.2 code were performed to determine the deposited dose in the culture medium for RT scenarios involving TNT clusters and cells. The results demonstrated differences in the dose deposition values between the scenarios with and without TNTs. The study revealed that ZnTNT interfered with clonogenic integrity, suggesting its potential as a powerful tool for GBM treatment.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.