ArticleAmerican journal of preventive cardiology2024
Epicardial fat modifies the relationship between coronary calcium score and all-cause mortality: The St. Francis Heart Study.
Article in American journal of preventive cardiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prognostic value of epicardial and pericardial adipose tissue in patients with chronic heart failure.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2026Article
- Critique on "Epicardial Fat Thickness as a Marker of Coronary Artery Disease in Diabetics: A Single Center Study".Clinical cardiology · 2026Article
- Association between region-specific epicardial adipose tissue and CT-derived fractional flow reserve-defined myocardial ischemia: a retrospective coronary CTA study stratified by hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Epicardial fat density obtained with computed tomography imaging - more important than volume?Cardiovascular diabetology · 2024Review
- Lipid Accumulation Product Is Predictive of Cardiovascular Hospitalizations among Patients with Stable Ischemic Heart Disease: Long-Term Follow-Up of the LAERTES Study.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Epicardial fat is associated with cardiovascular risk factors and adverse outcomes. However, it is not clear if epicardial fat remains to be a mortality risk when coronary calcium score (CAC) is taken into account. Methods: We studied the 1005 participants from the St. Francis Heart Study who were apparently healthy with CAC scores at 80th percentile or higher for age and gender, randomly assigned to placebo or statin therapy. At baseline, lipid profiles and non-contrast CT images were obtained where the epicardial fat volume was analyzed. Likelihood ratio testing was used to assess the additional prognostic value of epicardial fat to CAC for the risk of all-cause mortality. Results: Increased epicardial fat volume was associated with higher CAC. For each unit increase in lnCAC, the average epicardial fat volume increased by 3.34 mL/m Conclusion: Increased epicardial fat volume is associated with increased all-cause mortality risk. In addition, it portends incremental prognostic value to CAC score in mortality prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.