ArticleTranslational neuroscience2024
Acute ischemic STROKE - from laboratory to the Patient's BED (STROKELABED): A translational approach to reperfusion injury. Study Protocol.
Article in Translational neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Next-Generation Stroke Biomarkers: Bridging the Gap Between Innovation and Translation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- A novel model of light-induced middle cerebral artery occlusion and recanalization in mice.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Predicting reperfusion injury and functional status after stroke using blood biomarkers: the STROKELABED study.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cerebral edema (CE) and hemorrhagic transformation (HT) are frequent and unpredictable events in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS), even when an effective vessel recanalization has been achieved. These complications, related to blood-brain barrier (BBB) disruption, remain difficult to prevent or treat and may offset the beneficial effect of recanalization, and lead to poor outcomes. The aim of this translational study is to evaluate the association of circulating and imaging biomarkers with subsequent CE and HT in stroke patients with the dual purpose of investigating possible predictors as well as molecular dynamics underpinning those events and functional outcomes. Concurrently, the preclinical study will develop a new mouse model of middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusion and recanalization to explore BBB alterations and their potentially harmful effects on tissue. The clinical section of the study is based on a single-center observational design enrolling consecutive patients with AIS in the anterior circulation territory, treated with recanalization therapies from October 1, 2015 to May 31, 2020. The study will employ an innovative evaluation of routine CT scans: in fact, we will assess and quantify the presence of CE and HT after stroke in CT scans at 24 h, through the quantification of anatomical distortion (AD), a measure of CE and HT. We will investigate the relationship of AD and several blood biomarkers of inflammation and extracellular matrix, with functional outcomes at 3 months. In parallel, we will employ a newly developed mouse model of stroke and recanalization, to investigate the emergence of BBB changes 24 h after the stroke onset. The close interaction between clinical and preclinical research can enhance our understanding of findings from each branch of research, enabling a deeper interpretation of the underlying mechanisms of reperfusion injury following recanalization treatment for AIS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.