Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39005707›Full record

ReviewTrauma surgery & acute care open2024

Diagnostic and therapeutic considerations in cases of civilian intravascular ballistic embolism: a review of case reports.

Nicole Russell, Ethan J Vieira, Lexi R Freeman, Alexander L Eastman, Uzer Khan, Haley M Schluterman, Caroline Beakes, Sioned Kirkpatrick, Jennifer L Grant

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trauma surgery & acute care open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nicole RussellAnne Burnett Marion School of Medicine, Texas Christian University, Fort Worth, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2571-7406
Ethan J VieiraAnne Burnett Marion School of Medicine, Texas Christian University, Fort Worth, Texas, USA.
Lexi R FreemanAnne Burnett Marion School of Medicine, Texas Christian University, Fort Worth, Texas, USA.
Alexander L EastmanDepartment of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Uzer KhanDepartment of Surgery, Texas Health Harris Methodist Hospital Fort Worth, Fort Worth, Texas, USA.
Haley M SchlutermanAnne Burnett Marion School of Medicine, Texas Christian University, Fort Worth, Texas, USA.
Caroline BeakesVirginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, Virginia, USA.
Sioned KirkpatrickDepartment of Surgery, Texas Health Harris Methodist Hospital Fort Worth, Fort Worth, Texas, USA.
Jennifer L GrantDepartment of Surgery, Texas Health Harris Methodist Hospital Fort Worth, Fort Worth, Texas, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Ballistic embolism (BE) is a rare complication of firearm injuries notoriously associated with a vexing clinical picture in the trauma bay. Unless considered early, the associated confusion can lead to needless delay in the management of the patient with a gunshot wound. Despite this known entity, there is a relative paucity of high-grade evidence regarding complications, management, and follow-up in these patients. Methods: An electronic database literature search was conducted to identify cases of acute intravascular BE in pediatric and adult civilians occurring during index hospitalization, filtered to publications during the past 10 years. Exclusion criteria included non-vascular embolization, injuries occurring in the military setting, and delayed migration defined as occurring after discharge from the index hospitalization. Results: A total of 136 cases were analyzed. Nearly all cases of BE occurred within 48 hours of presentation. Compared with venous emboli, arterial emboli were significantly more likely to be symptomatic (71% vs. 7%, p<0.001), and 43% of patients developed symptoms attributable to BE in the trauma bay. In addition, arterial emboli were significantly less likely to be managed non-invasively (19% vs. 49%, p<0.001). Open retrieval was significantly more likely to be successful compared with endovascular attempts (91% vs. 29%, p<0.001). Patients with arterial emboli were more likely to receive follow-up (52% vs. 39%) and any attempt at retrieval during the hospitalization was significantly associated with outpatient follow-up (p=0.034). All but one patient remained stable or had clinically improved symptoms after discharge. Conclusion: Consideration for BE is reasonable in any patient with new or persistent unexplained signs or symptoms, especially during the first 48 hours after a penetrating firearm injury. Although venous BE can often be safely observed, arterial BE generally necessitates urgent retrieval. Patients who are managed non-invasively may benefit from follow-up in the first year after injury.

Indexed as

FirearmsMultiple TraumaWounds, GunshotWounds, Penetrating

Identifiers

PMID39005707
PMCPMC11243208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.