ArticleIranian journal of microbiology2024
Screening and evaluation of the ruminal cellulolytic bacteria and their potential application as probiotics.
Article in Iranian journal of microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ruminal tannase-producing bacteria and their effects on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, blood parameters, and rumen bacterial populations in weaning Afshar-Kurdi lambs fed pomegranate peel.Tropical animal health and production · 2026Article
- Chestnut tannins impair ruminal fiber degradation through modulation of cellulolytic bacterial activity in sheep: an in vivo and in vitro investigation.Journal of animal science · 2025Article
- Effect of tannin-degrading bacteria isolated from the rumen of some ruminants on theVeterinary research forum : an international quarterly journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Rumen microbiologists are looking for new probiotics to improve the digestibility of livestock diets. This study intended to screen and evaluate the ruminal cellulolytic bacteria (CBs) and their potential application as probiotics. Materials and Methods: Microbial culture and molecular techniques performed to isolate CBs from the rumen of camels, deer and rams. Their antibacterial and antibiogram tests were done using disc diffusion method. Their potential to degrade cellulose, starch, tannin and protein were investigated using clear zone halo, and spectrophotometric techniques. Bilious, saline, and acidic broth media were used to study the resistance of isolates in intestinal conditions. Results: The phylogenetic analysis revealed that the strains belonged to Firmicutes and Proteobacteria phyla, Conclusion: This study reports the cellulolytic
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.