Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39005582›Full record

ArticleBrain & spine2024

Reliability and variability of pressure reactivity index (prx) during oscillatory pattern in arterial blood pressure and intracranial pressure in traumatic brain injured patients.

Virginia Motroni, Giada Cucciolini, Erta Beqiri, Claudia Ann Smith, Michael Placek, Ka Hing Chu, Marek Czosnyka, Peter Smielewski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain & spine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Virginia MotroniDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, Division of Neurosurgery, Brain Physics Laboratory, University of Cambridge, UK.
Giada CuccioliniDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, Division of Neurosurgery, Brain Physics Laboratory, University of Cambridge, UK.
Erta BeqiriDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, Division of Neurosurgery, Brain Physics Laboratory, University of Cambridge, UK.
Claudia Ann SmithDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, Division of Neurosurgery, Brain Physics Laboratory, University of Cambridge, UK.
Michael PlacekDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, Division of Neurosurgery, Brain Physics Laboratory, University of Cambridge, UK.
Ka Hing ChuDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, Division of Neurosurgery, Brain Physics Laboratory, University of Cambridge, UK.
Marek CzosnykaDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, Division of Neurosurgery, Brain Physics Laboratory, University of Cambridge, UK.
Peter SmielewskiDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, Division of Neurosurgery, Brain Physics Laboratory, University of Cambridge, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Pressure reactivity index (PRx) is used for continuous monitoring of cerebrovascular reactivity in traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, PRx has a noisy character. Oscillations in arterial blood pressure (ABP) introduced by cyclic positive end-expiratory pressure adjustment, can make PRx more reliable. However, if oscillations are introduced by the cycling process of an anti-decubitus-mattress the effect on PRx is confounding, as they affect directly also intracranial pressure (ICP). In our routine monitoring in TBI patients we noticed periods of highly regular, slow, spontaneous oscillations in ABP and ICP signals. Research question: We set out to explore the nature of these oscillations and establish if PRx remains reliable during the oscillations. Materials and methods: 10 TBI patients' recordings with oscillations in ICP and ABP were analysed. We computed PRx, PRx variability (hourly-average of standard-deviation, SD), phase-shift and coherence between ABP and ICP in the slow frequency range. Metrics were compared between oscillation and peri-oscillation periods. Results: During oscillations (frequency 0.006 Discussion and conclusions: Spontaneous oscillations observed in ABP and ICP signals were found to enhance rather than confound PRx reliability. Further research is warranted to elucidate the nature of these oscillations and develop strategies to leverage them for enhancing PRx reliability in TBI monitoring.

Indexed as

AutoregulationOscillationsPRxReliabilityVariability

Identifiers

PMID39005582
PMCPMC11246011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.