ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024
Self-organizing recruitment of compensatory areas maximizes residual motor performance post-stroke.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Whereas the orderly recruitment of compensatory motor cortical areas after stroke depends on the size of the motor cortex lesion affecting arm and hand movements, the mechanisms underlying this reorganization are unknown. Here, we hypothesized that the recruitment of compensatory areas results from the motor system's goal to optimize performance given the anatomical constraints before and after the lesion. This optimization is achieved through two complementary plastic processes: a homeostatic regulation process, which maximizes information transfer in sensory-motor networks, and a reinforcement learning process, which minimizes movement error and effort. To test this hypothesis, we developed a neuro-musculoskeletal model that controls a 7-muscle planar arm via a cortical network that includes a primary motor cortex and a premotor cortex that directly project to spinal motor neurons, and a contra-lesional primary motor cortex that projects to spinal motor neurons via the reticular formation. Synapses in the cortical areas are updated via reinforcement learning and the activity of spinal motor neurons is adjusted through homeostatic regulation. The model replicated neural, muscular, and behavioral outcomes in both non-lesioned and lesioned brains. With increasing lesion sizes, the model demonstrated systematic recruitment of the remaining primary motor cortex, premotor cortex, and contra-lesional cortex. The premotor cortex acted as a reserve area for fine motor control recovery, while the contra-lesional cortex helped avoid paralysis at the cost of poor joint control. Plasticity in spinal motor neurons enabled force generation after large cortical lesions despite weak corticospinal inputs. Compensatory activity in the premotor and contra-lesional motor cortex was more prominent in the early recovery period, gradually decreasing as the network minimized effort. Thus, the orderly recruitment of compensatory areas following strokes of varying sizes results from biologically plausible local plastic processes that maximize performance, whether the brain is intact or lesioned.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.