Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39005043›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2024

Primary somatosensory cortical processing in tactile communication.

Anne Margarette S Maallo, Giovanni Novembre, Anikó Kusztor, Sarah McIntyre, Ali Israr, Gregory Gerling, Malin Björnsdotter, Håkan Olausson, Rebecca Boehme

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Sensing and feeling: an overview.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  3. Primary somatosensory cortical processing in tactile communication.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Anne Margarette S MaalloCenter for Social and Affective Neuroscience, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, 58183 Linköping, Sweden.
Giovanni NovembreDivision of Cell and Neurobiology, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, 58183 Linköping, Sweden.
Anikó KusztorSchool of Psychological Science, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria 3168, Australia.
Sarah McIntyreCenter for Social and Affective Neuroscience, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, 58183 Linköping, Sweden.
Ali IsrarReality Labs Research, Meta Platforms Inc., Redmond, WA 98052, USA.
Gregory GerlingDepartment of Systems and Information Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904, USA.
Malin BjörnsdotterDepartment of Affective Psychiatry, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, 41345 Gothenburg, Sweden.
Håkan OlaussonCenter for Social and Affective Neuroscience, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, 58183 Linköping, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-6319-1786
Rebecca BoehmeCenter for Social and Affective Neuroscience, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, 58183 Linköping, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Touch is an essential form of non-verbal communication. While language and its neural basis are widely studied, tactile communication is less well understood. We used fMRI and multivariate pattern analyses in pairs of emotionally close adults to examine the neural basis of human-to-human tactile communication. In each pair, a participant was designated either as sender or as receiver. The sender was instructed to communicate specific messages by touching only the arm of the receiver, who was inside the scanner. The receiver then identified the message based on the touch expression alone. We designed two multivariate decoder algorithms-one based on the sender's intent (sender-decoder), and another based on the receiver's response (receiver-decoder). We identified several brain areas that significantly predicted behavioural accuracy of the receiver. Regarding our

Indexed as

BrainEmotionsTouchAdultCuesFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNonverbal CommunicationcommunicationfMRItouch

Identifiers

PMID39005043
PMCPMC11528362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.