ArticleGenome biology and evolution2024
Ancestral Sequence Reconstruction as a Tool to Detect and Study De Novo Gene Emergence.
Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- DetectNAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Emergence and evolution of protein-coding de novo genes.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026Review
- Microproteins in Human Physiology and Pathology.Biochemistry · 2026Review
- Emergence and Tandem Repeat-Mediated Elongation of a Translated De Novo Open Reading Frame in Human Oncogenic RNA Gene VPS9D1-AS1 (MYU).Genome biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Impact of GC content on de novo gene birth.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Orphan and de novo Genes in Fungi and Animals: Identification, Origins and Functions.Genome biology and evolution · 2025Review
- De Novo Genes: Current Status and Future Goals.Genome biology and evolution · 2025Article
- De novo origin of numerous microproteins in enterobacteria.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- De Novo Gene Emergence: Summary, Classification, and Challenges of Current Methods.Genome biology and evolution · 2025Review
- De novo gene birth and the conundrum of ORFan genes in bacteria.Genome research · 2025Review
- Annotation matters: the effect of structural gene annotation on orthology inference.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Robust phylogenetic profile clustering forPeerJ · 2025Article
- De Novo Emerged Gene Search in Eukaryotes with DENSE.Genome biology and evolution · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
New protein-coding genes can evolve from previously noncoding genomic regions through a process known as de novo gene emergence. Evidence suggests that this process has likely occurred throughout evolution and across the tree of life. Yet, confidently identifying de novo emerged genes remains challenging. Ancestral sequence reconstruction is a promising approach for inferring whether a gene has emerged de novo or not, as it allows us to inspect whether a given genomic locus ancestrally harbored protein-coding capacity. However, the use of ancestral sequence reconstruction in the context of de novo emergence is still in its infancy and its capabilities, limitations, and overall potential are largely unknown. Notably, it is difficult to formally evaluate the protein-coding capacity of ancestral sequences, particularly when new gene candidates are short. How well-suited is ancestral sequence reconstruction as a tool for the detection and study of de novo genes? Here, we address this question by designing an ancestral sequence reconstruction workflow incorporating different tools and sets of parameters and by introducing a formal criterion that allows to estimate, within a desired level of confidence, when protein-coding capacity originated at a particular locus. Applying this workflow on ∼2,600 short, annotated budding yeast genes (<1,000 nucleotides), we found that ancestral sequence reconstruction robustly predicts an ancient origin for the most widely conserved genes, which constitute "easy" cases. For less robust cases, we calculated a randomization-based empirical P-value estimating whether the observed conservation between the extant and ancestral reading frame could be attributed to chance. This formal criterion allowed us to pinpoint a branch of origin for most of the less robust cases, identifying 49 genes that can unequivocally be considered de novo originated since the split of the Saccharomyces genus, including 37 Saccharomyces cerevisiae-specific genes. We find that for the remaining equivocal cases we cannot rule out different evolutionary scenarios including rapid evolution, multiple gene losses, or a recent de novo origin. Overall, our findings suggest that ancestral sequence reconstruction is a valuable tool to study de novo gene emergence but should be applied with caution and awareness of its limitations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.