Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39004882›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2024

Assessment of Digital Dentistry Knowledge and Practices Among Dental Students at King Faisal University, Saudi Arabia.

Muhammad Farooq Umer, Muhammad Faheemuddin, Yazeed Ali Alshehri, Abdulmalik Abdullah Algosaibi, Abdulaziz Ali Alojail, Abdullaziz Abdullah Althani, Mohammed Abdulrahim Alnaim, Sami Abdullah Alharbi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Muhammad Farooq UmerDepartment of Preventive Dentistry, College of Dentistry, King Faisal University, Hofuf, Saudi Arabia.
Muhammad FaheemuddinDepartment of Prosthodontics and Implantology, College of Dentistry, King Faisal University, Hofuf, Saudi Arabia.
Yazeed Ali AlshehriDental Intern Department, College of Dentistry, King Faisal University, Hofuf, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulmalik Abdullah AlgosaibiDental Intern Department, College of Dentistry, King Faisal University, Hofuf, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulaziz Ali AlojailDental Intern Department, College of Dentistry, King Faisal University, Hofuf, Saudi Arabia.
Abdullaziz Abdullah AlthaniDental Intern Department, College of Dentistry, King Faisal University, Hofuf, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed Abdulrahim AlnaimDental Intern Department, College of Dentistry, King Faisal University, Hofuf, Saudi Arabia.
Sami Abdullah AlharbiDental Intern Department, College of Dentistry, King Faisal University, Hofuf, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND Digital dental (DD) technologies need to be developed for dental use because of the prominent position that these technologies have recently acquired. This 21-item online questionnaire-based study aimed to assess the understanding of DD methods in 120 undergraduate dental students at King Faisal University, Saudi Arabia (SA). MATERIAL AND METHODS Electronic surveys were sent to 123 dental students at different study phases (basic, preclinical, and clinical). Dental students were requested to answer the questionnaires in accordance with their knowledge, observations, particular experiences, and DD practice. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, which involved numerical values and ratios. Then, the associations among study level, knowledge, practice, and study phases were analyzed using chi-square and Fisher's exact tests. RESULTS Completed questionnaires were returned by 120 students. The chi-square test showed significant differences in relation to questions "Do you have any previous knowledge of DD?", "The field that uses DD the most is…", "Does DD provide more precise results than conventional dentistry?", and "Do you know about CAD/CAM?", with P values of 0.006, 0.000, 0.018, and 0.002, respectively. Students at clinical phase exhibited significantly higher levels of knowledge than those at the preclinical phase (P<0.01). With regard to DD practice, 73.3% of students expressed a negative viewpoint, 82.5% stated that DD is essential for the future, and half said that practicing DD will result in improvements in patient satisfaction, time consumed, and level of predictability. CONCLUSIONS Students at basic, preclinical, and clinical phases had good knowledge on DD and were motivated to practice it in future in their workplaces.

Indexed as

Students, DentalAdultDentistryDigital TechnologyEducation, DentalFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleSaudi ArabiaSurveys and QuestionnairesUniversitiesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39004882
PMCPMC11302256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.