Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39004809›Full record

ArticleCancer science2024

Salivary metabolomic biomarkers for esophageal and gastric cancers by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry.

Kosuke Nakane, Koichi Yagi, Sho Yajima, Sachiyo Nomura, Masahiro Sugimoto, Yasuyuki Seto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kosuke NakaneDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-0166-2610
Koichi YagiDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8319-8005
Sho YajimaDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Sachiyo NomuraDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4293-6205
Masahiro SugimotoInstitute of Medical Science, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3316-2543
Yasuyuki SetoDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6953-8752

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early detection of esophageal and gastric cancers is essential for patients' prognosis; however, optimal noninvasive screening tests are currently not available. Saliva is a biofluid that is readily available, allowing for frequent screening tests. Thus, we explored salivary diagnostic biomarkers for esophageal and gastric cancers using metabolomic analyses. Saliva samples were collected from patients with esophageal (n = 50) and gastric cancer (n = 63), and patients without cancer as controls (n = 20). Salivary metabolites were analyzed by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry to identify salivary biomarkers. We also examined the metabolic profiles of gastric cancer tissues and compared them with the salivary biomarkers. The sensitivity of the diagnostic models based on salivary biomarkers was assessed by comparing it with that of serum tumor markers. Additionally, using postoperative saliva samples collected from patients with gastric cancer, we analyzed the changes in the biomarkers' concentrations before and after surgery. Cytosine was detected as a salivary biomarker for gastric cancer, and cytosine, 2-oxoglutarate, and arginine were detected as salivary biomarkers for esophageal cancer. Cytidine, a cytosine nucleotide, showed decreased concentrations in gastric cancer tissues. The sensitivity of the diagnostic models for esophageal and gastric cancers was 66.0% and 47.6%, respectively, while that of serum tumor markers was 40%. Salivary cytosine concentration increased significantly postoperatively relative to the preoperative value. In summary, we identified salivary biomarkers for esophageal and gastric cancers, which showed diagnostic sensitivity at least comparable to that of serum tumor markers. Salivary metabolomic tests could be promising screening tests for these types of cancer.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorEsophageal NeoplasmsMetabolomicsSalivaStomach NeoplasmsAdultAgedChromatography, LiquidEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansLiquid Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryMaleMass SpectrometryMiddle AgedSensitivity and SpecificityBiomarkers, Tumoresophageal cancergastric cancerLC‐MSmetabolomesaliva

Identifiers

PMID39004809
PMCPMC11463073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.