SynthesisCritical care (London, England)2024
Efficacy and safety of different polymyxin-containing regimens for the treatment of pneumonia caused by multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Critical care (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The outcomes in nephrotoxicity among therapies utilizing three distinct polymyxins: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Analysis of the efficacy and safety of intravenous injection combined with nebulized inhalation of polymyxin E sodium methanesulfonate in the treatment of carbapenem resistant gram-negative bacterial infections in the lungs.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Observational
- Efficacy and Safety of Different Colistin Administration Routes for Nosocomial Pneumonia Caused by Carbapenem-Resistant Organisms: A Single Centre, Open Label, Prospective Cohort Study.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Article
- Safety and Efficacy of Nebulized Inhalation of Polymyxin B Sulfate for Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacterial Pneumonia: A Multi-Center, Prospective, Observational Study.Infection and drug resistance · 2026Article
- A comparative study of intravenous polymyxin B and colistimethate sodium on efficacy, safety, and cost comparison in treating pulmonary infections: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Predictors of clinical outcomes in Chinese patients with carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacterial infections receiving colistimethate sodium: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- In Vitro and In Silico Evaluation of Polymyxin B Aerosol Delivery in Adult Mechanical Ventilation.Pharmaceutics · 2025Article
- Analysis and comparison of adverse events of colistin administered by different routes based on the FAERS database.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections with Polymyxins: A Review.Infection and drug resistance · 2025Review
- Polymyxin-containing regimens for treating of pneumonia caused by multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria: Mind the breakpoints and the standardization of nebulization therapy.Critical care (London, England) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe optimal administration of polymyxins for treating multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacterial (MDR-GNB) pneumonia remains unclear. This study aimed to systematically assess the efficacy and safety of three polymyxin-containing regimens by conducting a comprehensive network meta-analysis.
methodsWe comprehensively searched nine databases. Overall mortality was the primary outcome, whereas the secondary outcomes encompassed microbial eradication rate, clinical success, acute kidney injury, and incidence of bronchospasm. Extracted study data were analyzed by pairwise and network meta-analyses. Version 2 of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool and the Risk of Bias in Nonrandomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) assessment tool were used to assess the risk of bias in randomized trials and cohort studies, respectively.
resultsThis study included 19 observational studies and 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), encompassing 3318 patients. Six studies with high risk of bias were excluded from the primary analysis. In the pairwise meta-analysis, compared to the intravenous (IV) polymyxin-containing regimen, the intravenous plus inhaled (IV + IH) polymyxin-containing regimen showed a significant decrease in overall mortality, while no statistically significant difference was found in the inhaled (IH) polymyxin-containing regimen. The network meta-analysis indicated that the IV + IH polymyxin-containing regimen had significantly lower overall mortality (OR 0.67; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.50-0.88), higher clinical success rate (OR 1.90; 95% CI 1.20-3.00), better microbial eradication rate (OR 2.70; 95% CI 1.90-3.90) than the IV polymyxin-containing regimen, and significantly better microbial eradication rate when compared with the IH polymyxin-containing regimen (OR 2.30; 95% CI 1.30-4.20). Furthermore, compared with IV + IH and IV polymyxin-containing regimens, the IH polymyxin-containing regimen showed a significant reduction in acute kidney injury.
conclusionsOur study indicates that among the three administration regimens, the IV + IH polymyxin-containing regimen may be the most effective for treating MDR-GNB pneumonia, with a significantly lower overall mortality compared to the IV regimen and a considerably higher microbial eradication rate compared to the IH regimen. The IH regimen may be considered superior to the IV regimen due to its substantially lower incidence of acute kidney injury, even though the reduction in overall mortality was not significant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.