Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39004756›Full record

ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2024

Task and stimulus coding in the multiple-demand network.

Sneha Shashidhara, Moataz Assem, Matthew F Glasser, John Duncan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sneha ShashidharaCenter for Social and Behaviour Change, Ashoka University, Sonipat, 131029, India.ORCID 0000-0002-7469-0919
Moataz AssemMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB27EF, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6246-5856
Matthew F GlasserDepartments of Radiology and Neuroscience, Washington University in St. Louis, Saint Louis, MO 63110, United States.
John DuncanMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB27EF, United Kingdom.

Funding

RECONSTRUCTIONS AND REPRESENTATIONS OF CEREBRAL CORTEXR01MH060974 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI VAN ESSEN, DAVID C · 1999 to 2024
$12.7M
Cambridge Commonwealth European and International TrustGates Cambridge TrustMedical Research Council SUAG/045.G101400NIH HHS R01MH060974NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH060974
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the human brain, a multiple-demand (MD) network plays a key role in cognitive control, with core components in lateral frontal, dorsomedial frontal and lateral parietal cortex, and multivariate activity patterns that discriminate the contents of many cognitive activities. In prefrontal cortex of the behaving monkey, different cognitive operations are associated with very different patterns of neural activity, while details of a particular stimulus are encoded as small variations on these basic patterns (Sigala et al, 2008). Here, using the advanced fMRI methods of the Human Connectome Project and their 360-region cortical parcellation, we searched for a similar result in MD activation patterns. In each parcel, we compared multivertex patterns for every combination of three tasks (working memory, task-switching, and stop-signal) and two stimulus classes (faces and buildings). Though both task and stimulus category were discriminated in every cortical parcel, the strength of discrimination varied strongly across parcels. The different cognitive operations of the three tasks were strongly discriminated in MD regions. Stimulus categories, in contrast, were most strongly discriminated in a large region of primary and higher visual cortex, and intriguingly, in both parietal and frontal lobe regions adjacent to core MD regions. In the monkey, frontal neurons show a strong pattern of nonlinear mixed selectivity, with activity reflecting specific conjunctions of task events. In our data, however, there was limited evidence for mixed selectivity; throughout the brain, discriminations of task and stimulus combined largely linearly, with a small nonlinear component. In MD regions, human fMRI data recapitulate some but not all aspects of electrophysiological data from nonhuman primates.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingAdultBrainBrain MappingCognitionConnectomeFemaleHumansMaleMemory, Short-TermNerve NetPhotic StimulationYoung Adultfaces and housesmixed selectivitymultiple-demand networkRSAtask demand

Identifiers

PMID39004756
PMCPMC11246790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.