Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39004751›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2024

Commercially available activity monitors such as the fitbit charge and apple watch show poor validity in patients with gait aids after total knee arthroplasty.

Paul Kooner, Sandhya Baskaran, Vanessa Gibbs, Sam Wein, Ronald Dimentberg, Anthony Albers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Paul KoonerDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, McGill University, McGill University Health Centre, 1650 Cedar Avenue, Montreal, Qc, H3G 1A4, Canada. paul.kooner@mail.mcgill.ca.
Sandhya BaskaranDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, St. Mary's Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Vanessa GibbsDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, St. Mary's Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Sam WeinDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, St. Mary's Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Ronald DimentbergDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, St. Mary's Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Anthony AlbersDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, St. Mary's Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study is to determine the validity of consumer grade step counter devices during the early recovery period after knee replacement surgery.

methodsTwenty-three participants wore a Fitbit Charge or Apple Watch Series 4 smart watch and performed a walking test along a 50-metre hallway. There were 9 males and 14 females included in the study with an average age of 68.5 years and BMI of 32. Each patient wore both the Fitbit Charge and Apple Watch while completing the walking test and an observer counted the ground truth value using a thumb-push tally counter. This test was repeated pre-operatively with no gait aid, immediately post operatively with a walker, at 6 weeks follow up with a cane and at 6 months with no gait aid. Bland-Altman plots were performed for all walking tests to compare the agreement between measurement techniques.

resultsMean overall agreement of step count for pre-operative and at 6 months for subjects walking without gait aids was excellent for both the Apple Watch vs. actual and Fitbit vs. actual with bias values ranging from - 0.87 to 1.36 with limits of agreement (LOA) ranging between - 10.82 and 15.91. While using a walker both devices showed extremely little agreement with the actual step count with bias values between 22.5 and 24.37 with LOA between 11.7 and 33.3. At 6 weeks post-op while using a cane, both the Apple Watch and Fitbit devices had a range of bias values between - 2.8 and 5.73 with LOA between - 13.51 and 24.97.

conclusionsThese devices show poor validity in the early post operative setting, especially with the use of gait aids, and therefore results should be interpreted with caution.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeAgedAged, 80 and overCanesFemaleFitness TrackersGaitHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsWalkersWalkingActivity monitorApple watchFitbitStep countTotal knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID39004751
PMCPMC11247726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.