Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39004656›Full record

ReviewJournal of religion and health2025

Beyond Belief and Practice: An Exploratory Literature Review and Discussion of the Differential Impact of Spirituality and Religiosity on Mental Health Disorders.

Mahua Jana Dubey, Ritwik Ghosh, Gautam Das, Dipayan Roy, Shambaditya Das, Arka Prava Chakraborty, Subham Chatterjee, Souvik Dubey, Julián Benito-León

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of religion and health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mahua Jana DubeyDepartment of Psychiatry, Berhampur Mental Hospital, Berhampur, Murshidabad, West Bengal, India.
Ritwik GhoshDepartment of General Medicine, Burdwan Medical College and Hospital, Burdwan, West Bengal, India.
Gautam DasDepartment of Neuromedicine, Bangur Institute of Neurosciences (BIN), Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Dipayan RoyDepartment of Biochemistry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Patna, Bihar, India.
Shambaditya DasDepartment of Neuromedicine, Bangur Institute of Neurosciences (BIN), Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Arka Prava ChakrabortyDepartment of Neuromedicine, Bangur Institute of Neurosciences (BIN), Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Subham ChatterjeeDepartment of Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry (IOP), Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Souvik DubeyDepartment of Neuromedicine, Bangur Institute of Neurosciences (BIN), Kolkata, West Bengal, India. drsouvik79@gmail.com.
Julián Benito-LeónDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital "12 de Octubre", Madrid, Spain. jbenitol67@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1769-4809

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The relationship between spirituality and religiosity and their impact on mental health is intricate and underexplored. This exploratory review aims to elucidate the distinct effects of these constructs, highlighting their contributions to psychological well-being and clinical practices. By dissecting the impacts of spirituality and religiosity on mental health, the study focuses on their individual and combined roles in shaping therapeutic approaches and theoretical understandings in the field. A literature review was conducted using PubMed, focusing on articles discussing spirituality, religiosity, and their intersection with mental health and psychopathology. Out of 312 identified articles, 69 peer-reviewed articles were included after screening for relevance. The results indicate that spirituality and religiosity significantly influence mental health yet are often conflated, leading to research inconsistencies and clinical challenges. Spirituality, as a broad and individualistic pathway, enhances personal well-being and resilience, often transcending organized religious practices. In contrast, religiosity, with its structured community support, sometimes imposes constraints that exacerbate stress under specific doctrinal pressures. Neurobiological evidence suggests that both constructs interact with cognitive processes and brain function, influencing emotional regulation and stress response. The study concludes that distinguishing between spirituality and religiosity is essential for precise academic discourse and effective clinical practice. This differentiation allows for more personalized therapeutic approaches, accommodating an individual's spiritual and religious contexts. The authors propose a refined framework for future research and therapeutic applications to be sensitive to the nuanced experiences of individuals and to better tailor interventions in clinical settings.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersReligion and PsychologySpiritualityHumansMental HealthLiterature reviewMental healthNeurobiologyPsychopathologyReligiositySpirituality

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.