Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Franz EhrlichFaculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany. franz.ehrlich@tu-dresden.de.
Tony SehrDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany.
Moritz BrandtDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany.
Martin SchmidtInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany.
Hagen MalbergInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany.
Martin SedlmayrFaculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany.
Miriam GoldammerFaculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany.
Funding
Institute for Clinical and Translational ResearchUL1TR001079 · NCATS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI FORD, DANIEL ERNEST · 2013 to 2017
$60.1M
Wake Forest Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR001420 · NCATS · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI ARD, JAMY D, FOLEY, KRISTIE L · 2015 to 2023
$32.3M
Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR000040 · NCATS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI GINSBERG, HENRY N · 2012 to 2015
$26.2M
Outcomes of Sleep Disorders in Older MenR01HL071194 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO · PI STONE, KATIE L · 2003 to 2013
$12.2M
ASSOCIATION OF SLEEP DISORDERS WITH CARDIOVASCULAR HEALTH ACROSS ETHNIC GROUPSR01HL098433 · NHLBI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI REDLINE, SUSAN S. · 2010 to 2015
$8.2M
National Sleep Research Resource (NSRR)R24HL114473 · NHLBI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI REDLINE, SUSAN S., ZHANG, GUO-QIANG · 2013 to 2017
$7.5M
DATA COORDINATING CENTER FOR SLEEP HEART STUDYU01HL064360 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI DIENER-WEST, MARIE · 1999 to 2007
$4.4M
THE SLEEP HEART HEALTH STUDY: READING CENTER APPLICATIONU01HL063463 · NHLBI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI REDLINE, SUSAN S. · 1999 to 2007
$2.8M
The Sleep Heart Health Study (SHHS)U01HL053938 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI QUAN, STUART F. · 1994 to 2007
$2.0M
Cigarette Smoke and Susceptibility to Influenza InfectionR01HL095163 · NHLBI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI JASPERS, ILONA, NOAH, TERRY L · 2009 to 2013
$2.0M
SLEEP HEART HEALTH STUDYU01HL053931 · NHLBI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI RAPOPORT, DAVID M. · 1994 to 2003
$1.9M
Outcomes of Sleep Disorders in Older Men-PortlandR01HL070838 · NHLBI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI ORWOLL, ERIC S. · 2003 to 2007
Aiming to apply automatic arousal detection to support sleep laboratories, we evaluated an optimized, state-of-the-art approach using data from daily work in our university hospital sleep laboratory. Therefore, a machine learning algorithm was trained and evaluated on 3423 polysomnograms of people with various sleep disorders. The model architecture is a U-net that accepts 50 Hz signals as input. We compared this algorithm with models trained on publicly available datasets, and evaluated these models using our clinical dataset, particularly with regard to the effects of different sleep disorders. In an effort to evaluate clinical relevance, we designed a metric based on the error of the predicted arousal index. Our models achieve an area under the precision recall curve (AUPRC) of up to 0.83 and F1 scores of up to 0.81. The model trained on our data showed no age or gender bias and no significant negative effect regarding sleep disorders on model performance compared to healthy sleep. In contrast, models trained on public datasets showed a small to moderate negative effect (calculated using Cohen's d) of sleep disorders on model performance. Therefore, we conclude that state-of-the-art arousal detection on our clinical data is possible with our model architecture. Thus, our results support the general recommendation to use a clinical dataset for training if the model is to be applied to clinical data.
Indexed as
ArousalMachine LearningPolysomnographySleepSleep Wake DisordersAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overArea Under CurveDatasets as TopicFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of Tests
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
State-of-the-art sleep arousal detection evaluated on a comprehensive clinical dataset. · full record | OpenQuestion