Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39004576›Full record

ArticleSurgery2024

Racial and ethnic disparities in access to total neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer.

Michelle Chan, Ganesh Rajasekar, Katherine D Arnow, Todd H Wagner, Aaron J Dawes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Black-White disparities across the colorectal cancer care continuum in the USA.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Michelle ChanSection of Colon & Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, CA.
Ganesh RajasekarDepartment of Surgery, Stanford-Surgery Policy Improvement Research and Education Center, Stanford, CA.
Katherine D ArnowDepartment of Surgery, Stanford-Surgery Policy Improvement Research and Education Center, Stanford, CA.
Todd H WagnerDepartment of Surgery, Stanford-Surgery Policy Improvement Research and Education Center, Stanford, CA; Health Economics Resource Center, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, CA.
Aaron J DawesSection of Colon & Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, CA; Department of Surgery, Stanford-Surgery Policy Improvement Research and Education Center, Stanford, CA. Electronic address: ajdawes@stanford.edu.

Funding

Institutional Career Development Core (KL2)KL2TR003143 · NCATS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI ASCH, STEVEN M. · 2019 to 2023
$8.7M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR003143NCI NIH HHS HHSN261201800009CNCI NIH HHS HHSN261201800009INCI NIH HHS HHSN261201800015CNCI NIH HHS HHSN261201800015INCI NIH HHS HHSN261201800032CNCI NIH HHS HHSN261201800032I
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTotal neoadjuvant therapy has revolutionized the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer and quickly become the new standard of care. Whether patients from all racial and ethnic groups have had equal access to these potential benefits, however, remains unknown.

methodsWe identified all adults diagnosed with locally advanced rectal cancer in California who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation from 2010 to 2020 using the California Cancer Registry. We used logistic regression to estimate the predicted probability of receiving total neoadjuvant therapy as opposed to traditional chemoradiotherapy for each racial and ethnic group and used a time-race interaction to evaluate trends in access to total neoadjuvant therapy over time. We also compared survival by racial and ethnic group and total neoadjuvant therapy status using Kaplan-Meier plots and Cox proportional hazards models.

resultsIn total, 6,856 patients met inclusion criteria. Overall, 36.6% of patients received total neoadjuvant therapy in 2010 compared with 66.3% in 2020. Latino patients were significantly less likely than non-Latino White patients to undergo total neoadjuvant therapy ; however, there was no difference in the rate of growth in total neoadjuvant therapy over time between racial and ethnic groups. Non-Latino Black patients appeared to have lower risk-adjusted survival compared with non-Latino White patients, although not among patients who underwent total neoadjuvant therapy .

conclusionAccess to total neoadjuvant therapy has increased significantly over time in California with no apparent difference in the rate of growth between racial and ethnic groups. We found no evidence of racial or ethnic disparities in survival among patients treated with total neoadjuvant therapy, suggesting that increasing access to high-quality cancer care may also improve health equity.

Indexed as

Healthcare DisparitiesHealth Services AccessibilityNeoadjuvant TherapyRectal NeoplasmsAdultAgedBlack or African AmericanCaliforniaEthnicityFemaleHispanic or LatinoHumansMaleMiddle AgedRegistriesRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID39004576
PMCPMC11381172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.