ArticleAmerican journal of epidemiology2025
Studying the association between longitudinal nondense breast tissue measurements and the risk of breast cancer: a joint modeling approach.
Article in American journal of epidemiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Conflicting results have appeared in the literature on whether the amount of nondense, adipose tissue in the breast is a risk factor or a protective factor for breast cancer (BC), and biological hypotheses supporting both have been proposed. We suggest here that limitations in study design and statistical methodology could potentially explain the inconsistent results. Specifically, we exploit recent advances in methodology and software developed for the joint analysis of multiple longitudinal outcomes and time-to-event data to jointly analyze dense and nondense tissue trajectories and the risk of BC in a large Swedish screening cohort. We also perform extensive sensitivity analyses by mimicking analyses/designs of previously published studies-for example, ignoring available longitudinal data. Overall, we do not find strong evidence supporting an association between nondense tissue and the risk of incident BC. We hypothesize that (1) previous studies have not been able to isolate the effect of nondense tissue from dense tissue or adipose tissue elsewhere in the body, that (2) estimates of the effect of nondense tissue on risk are strongly sensitive to modeling assumptions, or that (3) the effect size of nondense tissue on BC risk is likely to be small/not clinically relevant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.