ArticleTransfusion2024
Chronic automated red cell exchange therapy for sickle cell disease.
Article in Transfusion, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Isovolemic hemodilution red cell exchange and blood use in children and young adults with sickle cell disease.Blood. Red cells & iron · 2026Article
- Impact of Isovolemic Hemodilution-Red Cell Exchange on Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Sickle Cell Disease: A Pilot Study.Journal of clinical apheresis · 2026Article
- The right patient, the right treatment: tailoring sickle cell disease care.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2025Review
- Strategies to mitigate transfusion-associated red blood cell alloimmunization in sickle cell disease: A retrospective analysis.Transfusion · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe data to support chronic automated red cell exchange (RCE) in sickle cell disease (SCD) outside of stroke prevention, is limited, especially in adults. STUDY DESIGN AND
methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted of patients with SCD who were referred for chronic RCE at our institution over a 10-year period. Data that were evaluated included patient demographics, referral indications, and procedural details (e.g., vascular access, adverse events, etc.). In a subanalysis, the number of annual acute care encounters during 3 years of chronic RCE was compared with that in the year preceding the first RCE.
resultsA total of 164 patients were referred for chronic RCE: median age was 28 years (interquartile range [IQR] = 22-36) at referral and 60% were female. Seventy (42.6%) were naïve to chronic transfusion (simple or RCE) prior to referral. The leading indications for referral were refractory pain (73/164, 44.5%) and iron overload (57/164, 34.7%). A total of 5090 procedures occurred during the study period (median = 19, IQR = 5-45). Of the 138 patients who had central vascular access, 8 (6%) and 16 (12%) had ≥1 central-line-related thrombosis and/or infection, respectively. Of those who were not RBC alloimmunized at initiation of RCE, 12/105 (11.4%) developed new antibodies during chronic RCE. In those 30 patients who were adherent to therapy for 3 years, there was no significant difference in acute care encounters following initiation of RCE.
conclusionProspective clinical trials are needed to determine which patients are most likely to benefit from chronic RCE and refine selection accordingly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.