ReviewCritical care (London, England)2024
Enhancing sepsis biomarker development: key considerations from public and private perspectives.
Review in Critical care (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
61 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- CCL5 Levels, Disease Progression, and Mortality in Respiratory Viral Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JAMA network open · 2026Pooled it
- Platelet parameters as potential biomarkers for sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Assessing Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies in Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Systematic Review of Efficacy and Safety.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Pooled it
- Monocyte Distribution Width for Sepsis Diagnosis in the Emergency Department and Intensive Care Unit: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Pooled it
- Endogenous H₂S promotes HSPA8 sulfhydration to downregulate HIF1α and prevent ferroptosis in septic myocardial injury.Redox report : communications in free radical research · 2026Article
- Review
- Role of Matrix Metalloproteinases and Tissue Inhibitors in Sepsis Pathogenesis.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Association of early serial serum NLRP3 measurements with 28-day mortality in sepsis: a single-center retrospective landmark cohort study.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Incorporating WGCNA and Machine Learning to Identify ADAP2 as a Critical Efferocytosis-Related Gene in Sepsis.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Decoding Host-Pathogen Dynamics inAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Neonatal sepsis and cardiovascular dysfunction II: assessment.Pediatric research · 2026Review
- Challenges in early detection and prognostication of sepsis: new approaches from the emergency department and intensive care unit.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Review
- Proteomic biomarkers for early diagnosis and prognosis in pediatric sepsis.World journal of clinical pediatrics · 2026Article
- Systemic immune-inflammation (SII) index as a novel prognostic biomarker in critically ill patients with sepsis: analysis of the MIMIC-IV cohort and predictive modeling based on machine learning.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- The role of rapid molecular diagnostics in managing bloodstream infections: a microbiological insight.Folia microbiologica · 2026Review
- Targeting the Gut in Sepsis: Therapeutic Potential of Medical Gases.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- Nucleated Red Blood Cells for Predicting Mortality in Intensive Care Unit Patients With Sepsis.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026Article
- GC-MS metabolomics reveals potential biomarkers for infection-specific subtypes in sepsis.Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2026Article
- An 11-gene blood transcriptomic signature reflects a sepsis-associated host-response pattern across public cohorts.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Linking Metabolic and Mitochondrial Stress to Regulated Cell Death and Inflammatory Organ Injury in Sepsis.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Review
1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Implementation of biomarkers in sepsis and septic shock in emergency situations, remains highly challenging. This viewpoint arose from a public-private 3-day workshop aiming to facilitate the transition of sepsis biomarkers into clinical practice. The authors consist of international academic researchers and clinician-scientists and industry experts who gathered (i) to identify current obstacles impeding biomarker research in sepsis, (ii) to outline the important milestones of the critical path of biomarker development and (iii) to discuss novel avenues in biomarker discovery and implementation. To define more appropriately the potential place of biomarkers in sepsis, a better understanding of sepsis pathophysiology is mandatory, in particular the sepsis patient's trajectory from the early inflammatory onset to the late persisting immunosuppression phase. This time-varying host response urges to develop time-resolved test to characterize persistence of immunological dysfunctions. Furthermore, age-related difference has to be considered between adult and paediatric septic patients. In this context, numerous barriers to biomarker adoption in practice, such as lack of consensus about diagnostic performances, the absence of strict recommendations for sepsis biomarker development, cost and resources implications, methodological validation challenges or limited awareness and education have been identified. Biomarker-guided interventions for sepsis to identify patients that would benefit more from therapy, such as sTREM-1-guided Nangibotide treatment or Adrenomedullin-guided Enibarcimab treatment, appear promising but require further evaluation. Artificial intelligence also has great potential in the sepsis biomarker discovery field through capability to analyse high volume complex data and identify complex multiparametric patient endotypes or trajectories. To conclude, biomarker development in sepsis requires (i) a comprehensive and multidisciplinary approach employing the most advanced analytical tools, (ii) the creation of a platform that collaboratively merges scientific and commercial needs and (iii) the support of an expedited regulatory approval process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.