Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39003423›Full record

Observational studyPediatric cardiology2025

Interatrial Communications: Prevalence and Subtypes in 12,385 Newborns-a Copenhagen Baby Heart Study.

Elisabeth Blixenkrone-Møller, Sofie Dannesbo, Anna Maria Dehn, Christian A Pihl, Anne-Sophie Sillesen, R Ottilia B Vøgg, Anna Axelsson Raja, Steven Colan, Luc Mertens, Niels Vejlstrup and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Pediatric cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02753348 (Copenhagen Baby Heart), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02753348 completednot on this map

Copenhagen Baby Heart

TypeobservationalSponsorHenning BundgaardRan2016 to 2018Enrolled25,000ConditionsCongenital Heart DiseaseArmsEchocardiography, Blood analysis from umbilical cord blood, ECG, Measurement of oxygen saturation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Elisabeth Blixenkrone-MøllerDepartment of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, 2730, Copenhagen, Denmark. elisabeth.maria.blixenkrone-moeller.01@regionh.dk.
Sofie DannesboDepartment of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, 2730, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Anna Maria DehnDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The Heart Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Christian A PihlDepartment of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, 2730, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Anne-Sophie SillesenDepartment of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, 2730, Copenhagen, Denmark.
R Ottilia B VøggDepartment of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, 2730, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Anna Axelsson RajaDepartment of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Steven ColanDepartment of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, USA.
Luc MertensDepartment of Cardiology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Niels VejlstrupDepartment of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Henning Bundgaard *Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Kasper Iversen *Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, 2730, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prevalence of interatrial communications in newborns, i.e., patent foramen ovale or atrial septal defect, was previously reported to be between 24 and 92%, but the area has been impeded by lack of a universal classification method. A recently published novel echocardiographic diagnostic algorithm for systematic classification of interatrial communications had inter-and intraobserver agreements superior to standard expert assessment. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of subtypes of interatrial communications on transthoracic echocardiography in newborns. Echocardiograms of newborns aged 0-30 days were prospectively collected in the population-based cohort study Copenhagen Baby Heart Study in 2017-2018 and analyzed according to the new diagnostic algorithm, classifying interatrial communications into three subtypes of patent foramen ovale and three subtypes of atrial septal defects. Echocardiograms from 15,801 newborns were analyzed; 3416 (21.6%) were excluded due to suboptimal image quality or severe structural heart disease (n = 3), leaving 12,385 newborns (aged 12 [interquartile range 8; 15] days, 48.2% female) included in the study. An interatrial communication was detected in 9766 (78.9%) newborns. According to the algorithm, 9029 (72.9%) had a patent foramen ovale, while 737 (6.0%) fulfilled criteria for an atrial septal defect, further divided into subtypes. An interatrial communication was seen on echocardiography in almost 80% of newborns aged 0-30 days. Patent foramen ovale was 12 times more frequent than atrial septal defects. The observed prevalence of atrial septal defects was higher than previously reported. Follow up studies could distinguish which interatrial communications require follow-up or intervention. ClinicalTrial.gov, NCT02753348, posted April 27, 2016, [ https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02753348 ].

Indexed as

EchocardiographyForamen Ovale, PatentHeart Septal Defects, AtrialAlgorithmsDenmarkFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMalePrevalenceProspective StudiesAtrial septal defectEchocardiographyInteratrial communicationNeonatePatent foramen ovalePrevalence

Identifiers

PMID39003423
PMCPMC12296769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.