Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39003330›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Stone axes throw new light on Baltic stone age mortuary rites.

Anđa Petrović, Aija Macāne, Ivars Strautnieks, Laimdota Kalniņa, Elisabeth Holmqvist, Emily M Hunter, Diederik Pomstra, Helen Goodchild, Ana Harto Villén, Ilga Zagorska and 3 more

Abstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Anđa PetrovićDepartment of Archaeology, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Belgrade, Čika Ljubina 18-20, Belgrade, 11000, Serbia.
Aija MacāneDepartment of Cultures, University of Helsinki, Unioninkatu 38F, 00014, Helsinki, Finland.
Ivars StrautnieksFaculty of Geography and Earth Sciences, University of Latvia, Jelgavas iela 1, Riga, 1004, Latvia.
Laimdota KalniņaFaculty of Geography and Earth Sciences, University of Latvia, Jelgavas iela 1, Riga, 1004, Latvia.
Elisabeth HolmqvistDepartment of Cultures, University of Helsinki, Unioninkatu 38F, 00014, Helsinki, Finland.
Emily M HunterCentre for Anatomical and Human Sciences, Hull York Medical School, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
Diederik PomstraFaculty of Archaeology, Leiden University, Einsteinweg 2, 2333 CC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Helen GoodchildDepartment of Archaeology, University of York, King's Manor, Exhibition Square, York, YO1 7EP, UK.
Ana Harto VillénIndependent Researcher, Madrid, Spain.
Ilga ZagorskaInstitute of Latvian History, University of Latvia, Kalpaka bulvāris 4, Riga, 1050, Latvia.
Mark EdmondsDepartment of Archaeology, University of York, King's Manor, Exhibition Square, York, YO1 7EP, UK.
Kerkko NordqvistHelsinki Collegium for Advanced Studies, University of Helsinki, Fabianinkatu 24, 00014, Helsinki, Finland. kerkko.nordqvist@helsinki.fi.
Aimée LittleDepartment of Archaeology, Centre for Artefacts and Materials Analysis, University of York, PalaeoHub, Wentworth Way, York, YO10 5DD, UK. aimee.little@york.ac.uk.

Funding

Arts and Humanities Research Council AH/T00519X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite their ubiquity, Mesolithic lithic tools given as funerary offerings have rarely been studied in detail. Whereas personal ornaments (e.g. beads, pendants) are commonly interpreted as markers of social identity and status, archaeologists have struggled to understand the stone tools, commonly regarded as "utilitarian" items. As a result, this class of grave goods has not received the same level of attention, leaving a significant gap in our understanding of Mesolithic mortuary behaviours. Our research challenges long-lasting perceptions of lithic tools as strictly utilitarian objects and draws on studies of one of the most substantial stone axe funerary collections from one of the largest Stone Age cemeteries in Europe-Zvejnieki, Latvia. Evidence suggests the selection of unused axes as grave offerings, while unusual wear traces on an axe found in a female grave (no 57) raises questions about its use in the burial rites. Using a multi-proxy approach, we compare life histories of axes placed in burials to those recovered from contemporary, nearby settlement contexts. Finally, a strong correlation between axes and women and children at Zvejnieki challenges gendered stereotypes of stone tools, historically regarded as possessions of the adult male members of Stone Age societies.

Indexed as

ArchaeologyBurialCemeteriesFemaleHistory, AncientHumansLatviaMale

Identifiers

PMID39003330
PMCPMC11246506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.