Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39003322›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Building on the clinical applicability of ctDNA analysis in non-metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Ibone Labiano, Ana E Huerta, Maria Alsina, Hugo Arasanz, Natalia Castro, Saioa Mendaza, Arturo Lecumberri, Iranzu Gonzalez-Borja, David Guerrero-Setas, Ana Patiño-Garcia and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. High-Sensitivity ctDNA Analysis Uncovers Relevant Signals Missed by NGS in Pancreatic Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. ctDNA in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Critical Appraisal.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Ibone LabianoOncobiona Group, Navarrabiomed-Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra (IdiSNA), Irunlarrea 3, 31008, Pamplona, Spain.
Ana E HuertaOncobiona Group, Navarrabiomed-Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra (IdiSNA), Irunlarrea 3, 31008, Pamplona, Spain.
Maria AlsinaOncobiona Group, Navarrabiomed-Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra (IdiSNA), Irunlarrea 3, 31008, Pamplona, Spain. maria.alsina.maqueda@navarra.es.ORCID 0000-0003-4835-7159
Hugo ArasanzOncobiona Group, Navarrabiomed-Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra (IdiSNA), Irunlarrea 3, 31008, Pamplona, Spain.
Natalia CastroOncobiona Group, Navarrabiomed-Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra (IdiSNA), Irunlarrea 3, 31008, Pamplona, Spain.
Saioa MendazaOncobiona Group, Navarrabiomed-Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra (IdiSNA), Irunlarrea 3, 31008, Pamplona, Spain.
Arturo LecumberriOncobiona Group, Navarrabiomed-Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra (IdiSNA), Irunlarrea 3, 31008, Pamplona, Spain.
Iranzu Gonzalez-BorjaOncobiona Group, Navarrabiomed-Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra (IdiSNA), Irunlarrea 3, 31008, Pamplona, Spain.
David Guerrero-SetasMolecular Pathology of Cancer Group, Navarrabiomed, Hospital Universitario de Navarra (HUN), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra (IdiSNA), Irunlarrea 3, 31008, Pamplona, Spain.
Ana Patiño-GarciaDepartment of Pediatrics and Clinical Genetics, Clínica Universidad de Navarra (CUN), Cancer Center Clínica Universidad de Navarra (CCUN), Program in Solid Tumors, Center for Applied Medical Research (CIMA) and Navarra Institute for Health Research (IdiSNA), University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Gorka Alkorta-AranburuCIMA LAB Diagnostics, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Irene Hernández-GarciaOncobiona Group, Navarrabiomed-Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra (IdiSNA), Irunlarrea 3, 31008, Pamplona, Spain.
Virginia ArrazubiOncobiona Group, Navarrabiomed-Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra (IdiSNA), Irunlarrea 3, 31008, Pamplona, Spain.
Elena MataOncobiona Group, Navarrabiomed-Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra (IdiSNA), Irunlarrea 3, 31008, Pamplona, Spain.
David GomezOncobiona Group, Navarrabiomed-Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra (IdiSNA), Irunlarrea 3, 31008, Pamplona, Spain.
Antonio ViudezOncobiona Group, Navarrabiomed-Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra (IdiSNA), Irunlarrea 3, 31008, Pamplona, Spain.
Ruth VeraOncobiona Group, Navarrabiomed-Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra (IdiSNA), Irunlarrea 3, 31008, Pamplona, Spain.

Funding

Clínico Junior 2019 scholarship from the Spanish Association Against Cancer (AECC) CLJUN19010ARASClinico Junior 2023 scholarship from the Spanish Association Against Cancer (AECC) CLJUN234885LECUDepartment of Economic Development of Navarre 0011-1408-2017-000026Spanish National Agency of Research (AEI) FJC2021-046521-I
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma represents one of the solid tumors showing the worst prognosis worldwide, with a high recurrence rate after adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapy. Circulating tumor DNA analysis raised as a promising non-invasive tool to characterize tumor genomics and to assess treatment response. In this study, surgical tumor tissue and sequential blood samples were analyzed by next-generation sequencing and were correlated with clinical and pathological characteristics. Thirty resectable/borderline pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients treated at the Hospital Universitario de Navarra were included. Circulating tumoral DNA sequencing identified pathogenic variants in KRAS and TP53, and in other cancer-associated genes. Pathogenic variants at diagnosis were detected in patients with a poorer outcome, and were correlated with response to neoadjuvant therapy in borderline pancreatic ductal adneocarcinoma patients. Higher variant allele frequency at diagnosis was associated with worse prognosis, and thesum of variant allele frequency was greater in samples at progression. Our results build on the potential value of circulating tumor DNA for non-metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients, by complementing tissue genetic information and as a non-invasive tool for treatment decision. Confirmatory studies are needed to corroborate these findings.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalCirculating Tumor DNAPancreatic NeoplasmsAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorFemaleGene FrequencyHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMaleMiddle AgedMutationPrognosisProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)Tumor Suppressor Protein p53Biomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNAKRAS protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)Tumor Suppressor Protein p53BiomarkersGastrointestinal neoplasmsGenomicsLiquid biopsyPrecision medicine

Identifiers

PMID39003322
PMCPMC11246447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.