Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39003292›Full record

ArticleNature communications2024

Self-supervised learning for characterising histomorphological diversity and spatial RNA expression prediction across 23 human tissue types.

Francesco Cisternino, Sara Ometto, Soumick Chatterjee, Edoardo Giacopuzzi, Adam P Levine, Craig A Glastonbury

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Spatial architecture of development and disease.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Francesco CisterninoHuman Technopole, Viale Rita Levi-Montalcini 1, 20157, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9024-062X
Sara OmettoHuman Technopole, Viale Rita Levi-Montalcini 1, 20157, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0009-0009-1960-5062
Soumick ChatterjeeHuman Technopole, Viale Rita Levi-Montalcini 1, 20157, Milan, Italy.
Edoardo GiacopuzziHuman Technopole, Viale Rita Levi-Montalcini 1, 20157, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5692-366X
Adam P LevineResearch Department of Pathology, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1333-9938
Craig A GlastonburyHuman Technopole, Viale Rita Levi-Montalcini 1, 20157, Milan, Italy. craig.glastonbury@fht.org.ORCID 0000-0001-5542-2225

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As vast histological archives are digitised, there is a pressing need to be able to associate specific tissue substructures and incident pathology to disease outcomes without arduous annotation. Here, we learn self-supervised representations using a Vision Transformer, trained on 1.7 M histology images across 23 healthy tissues in 838 donors from the Genotype Tissue Expression consortium (GTEx). Using these representations, we can automatically segment tissues into their constituent tissue substructures and pathology proportions across thousands of whole slide images, outperforming other self-supervised methods (43% increase in silhouette score). Additionally, we can detect and quantify histological pathologies present, such as arterial calcification (AUROC = 0.93) and identify missing calcification diagnoses. Finally, to link gene expression to tissue morphology, we introduce RNAPath, a set of models trained on 23 tissue types that can predict and spatially localise individual RNA expression levels directly from H&E histology (mean genes significantly regressed = 5156, FDR 1%). We validate RNAPath spatial predictions with matched ground truth immunohistochemistry for several well characterised control genes, recapitulating their known spatial specificity. Together, these results demonstrate how self-supervised machine learning when applied to vast histological archives allows researchers to answer questions about tissue pathology, its spatial organisation and the interplay between morphological tissue variability and gene expression.

Indexed as

Supervised Machine LearningGene Expression ProfilingHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedOrgan SpecificityRNARNA

Identifiers

PMID39003292
PMCPMC11246527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.