ArticleBMJ supportive & palliative care2024
High early mortality following percutaneous nephrostomy in metastatic cancer: a national analysis of outcomes.
Article in BMJ supportive & palliative care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo assess the outcomes of percutaneous nephrostomy in England for renal decompression, in the context of metastatic cancer.
methodsRetrospective observational study of all patients undergoing nephrostomy with a diagnosis of metastatic cancer from 2010 to 2019 in England, identified and followed up within Hospital Episode Statistics.The primary outcome measure was mortality (14-day and 30-day postprocedure). Secondary outcomes included subsequent chemotherapy or surgery and direct complications of nephrostomy.
results10 932 patients were identified: 58.0% were male, 51.0% were >70 years old and 57.7% had no relevant comorbidities (according to Charlson's criteria, other than cancer).1 in 15 patients died within 14 days of nephrostomy and 1 in 6 died within 30 days. Factors associated with higher 30-day mortality were the presence of comorbidities (Charlson score 1-4 (OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.50, p=0.003), score 5+ (OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.45), p<0.001)); inpatient nephrostomy (OR 3.76, 95% CI 2.75 to 5.14, p<0.001) and admitted under the care of specialities of internal medicine (OR 2.10, 95% CI 1.84 to 2.40, p<0.001), oncology (OR 1.80, 95% CI 1.51 to 2.15, p<0.001), gynaecology/gynaeoncology (OR 1.66, 95% CI 1.21 to 2.28, p=0.002) or general surgery (OR 1.62, 95% CI 1.32 to 1.98, p<0.001)), compared with urology.25.4% received subsequent chemotherapy. Receiving chemotherapy was associated with younger patients (eg, age 18-29 (OR 4.04, 95% CI 2.66 to 6.12, p<0.001) and age 30-39 (OR 3.07, 95% CI 2.37 to 3.97, p<0.001)) and under the care of oncology (OR 1.60, 95% CI 1.40 to 1.83, p<0.001) or gynaecology/gynaeoncology (OR 1.64, 95%CI 1.28 to 2.10, p<0.001) compared with urology.43.8% had subsequent abdominopelvic surgery. Not receiving surgery was associated with inpatient nephrostomy (OR 0.82, 95%CI 0.72 to 0.95,p=0.007): non-genitourinary cancers (eg, gynaecology/gynaeoncology cancer (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.99, p=0.037)); and under the care of a non-surgical specialty (medicine (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.63 to 0.77, p<0.001), oncology (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.51 to 0.66, p<0.001)).24.5% of patients had at least one direct complication of nephrostomy: 12.5% required early exchange of nephrostomy, 8.1% had bleeding and 6.7% had pyelonephritis.
conclusionsThe decision to undertake nephrostomy in patients with poor prognosis cancer is complex and should be undertaken in a multidisciplinary team setting. Complication rates are high and minimal survival benefit is derived in many patients, especially in the context of emergency inpatient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.