Observational studyJournal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance2024
Regional variability of cardiovascular magnetic resonance access and utilization in the United States.
Observational study in Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy management: a systematic review of the clinical practice guidelines and recommendations.European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes · 2025Pooled it
- Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance recommendations toward environmentally sustainable cardiovascular magnetic resonance.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2025Guideline
- Accelerated stress CMR for the detection of significant coronary artery disease: a prospective randomized diagnostic accuracy study.European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging · 2026Trial
- The Return of Thallium-201 for American Patients: History, Radiopharmaceutical Features, and Current Applications.Current cardiology reports · 2026Review
- Deep learning prediction of left atrial structure and function from 12-lead electrocardiograms.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Advancements in Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Innovations, Challenges, and Future Directions.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Contrastive language image pretraining for a cardiac magnetic resonance image embedding with zero-shot capabilities.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Feasibility Study for Dual Phase Free Breathing 3D bSSFP MRA With Preserved Eddy-Current Tolerance With Adaptive k-Space Lengths (PETAL) Acquisition.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Distance and Likelihood of Cardiovascular Imaging Receipt Among Medicare Beneficiaries: Cardiovascular Imaging Deserts Among Medicare Beneficiaries.JACC. Cardiovascular imaging · 2026Article
- Article
- Diagnostic algorithm for clozapine-induced myocarditis: A systematic review.World journal of psychiatry · 2025Article
- The role of imaging in risk assessment for pulmonary arterial hypertension.Current opinion in cardiology · 2025Review
- Democratizing cardiac imaging with an automated magnetic resonance exam.Research square · 2025Article
- Current trends and challenges in the clinical use of cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a survey from the Italian Society of Cardiology.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2025Article
- Nationwide Cross-Sectional Analysis of Mortality Trends in Patients with Sarcoidosis and Non-Ischemic Cardiovascular Disease-The Impact of Gender, Ethnicity, Geographical Location, and COVID-19 Pandemic.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Temporal trends and geographic accessibility to cardiac magnetic resonance readers across the United States: an analysis of Medicare Part B data.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic ResonanceArticle
- Cardiovascular magnetic resonance worldwide: A global commitment to cardiovascular care.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic ResonanceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundClinical guidelines and scientific data increasingly support the appropriate use of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) . The extent of CMR adoption across the United States (US) remains unclear. This observational analysis aims to capture CMR practice patterns in the US.
methodsCommissioned reports from the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR), pre-existing survey data from CMR centers, and socioeconomic and coronary heart disease data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention were used. The location of imaging centers performing CMR was based on 2018 Medicare claims. Secondary analysis was performed on center-specific survey data from 2017-2019, which were collected by members of the SCMR US Advocacy Subcommittee for quality improvement purposes. The correlation between the number of imaging centers billing for CMR services per million persons, socioeconomic determinants, and coronary heart disease epidemiology was determined.
resultsA total of 591 imaging centers billed the Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services for CMR services in 2018 and 112 (of 155) unique CMR centers responded to the survey. In 2018, CMR services were available in almost all 50 states. Minnesota was the state with the highest number of CMR centers per million Medicare beneficiaries (52.6 centers per million), and Maine had the lowest (4.4 per million). The total density of CMR centers was 16 per million for US Medicare beneficiaries. Sixty-eight percent (83 of 112) of survey responders were cardiologists, and 28% (31/112) were radiologists. In 72% (71/112) of centers, academic health care systems performed 81%-100% of CMR exams. The number of high-volume centers (>500 scans per year) increased by seven between 2017 and 2019. In 2019, 53% (59/112) of centers were considered high-volume centers and had an average of 19 years of experience. Centers performing <50 scans had on average 3.5 years of experience. Approximate patient wait time for a CMR exam was 2 weeks to 1 month.
conclusionDespite increasing volume and availability in almost all 50 states, CMR access remains geographically variable. Advocacy efforts to improve access and innovations that reduce imaging time and exam complexity have the potential to increase the adoption of CMR technology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.