Convergent and divergent transcriptional reprogramming of motor and sensory neurons underlying response to peripheral nerve injury.

introductionMotor neurons differ from sensory neurons in aspects including origins and surrounding environment. Understanding the similarities and differences in molecular response to peripheral nerve injury (PNI) and regeneration between sensory and motor neurons is crucial for developing effective drug targets for CNS regeneration. However, genome-wide comparisons of molecular changes between sensory and motor neurons following PNI remains limited.

objectivesThis study aims to investigate genome-wide convergence and divergence of injury response between sensory and motor neurons to identify novel drug targets for neural repair.

methodsWe analyzed two large-scale RNA-seq datasets of in situ captured sensory neurons (SNs) and motoneurons (MNs) upon PNI, retinal ganglion cells and spinal cord upon CNS injury. Additionally, we integrated these with other related single-cell level datasets. Bootstrap DESeq2 and WGCNA were used to detect and explore co-expression modules of differentially expressed genes (DEGs).

resultsWe found that SNs and MNs exhibited similar injury states, but with a delayed response in MNs. We identified a conserved regeneration-associated module (cRAM) with 274 shared DEGs. Of which, 47% of DEGs could be changed in injured neurons supported by single-cell resolution datasets. We also identified some less-studied candidates in cRAM, including genes associated with transcription, ubiquitination (Rnf122), and neuron-immune cells cross-talk. Further in vitro experiments confirmed a novel role of Rnf122 in axon growth. Analysis of the top 10% of DEGs with a large divergence suggested that both extrinsic (e.g., immune microenvironment) and intrinsic factors (e.g., development) contributed to expression divergence between SNs and MNs following injury.

conclusionsThis comprehensive analysis revealed convergent and divergent injury response genes in SNs and MNs, providing new insights into transcriptional reprogramming of sensory and motor neurons responding to axonal injury and subsequent regeneration. It also identified some novel regeneration-associated candidates that may facilitate the development of strategies for axon regeneration.