ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2024
Domain adaptation using AdaBN and AdaIN for high-resolution IVD mesh reconstruction from clinical MRI.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- RadiolGAN: Multicenter Feasibility Study of Synthetic CT From 3D Ultra-Short Echo Time MRI for Enhanced Pulmonary Radiologic Sign Visualization.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeDeep learning has firmly established its dominance in medical imaging applications. However, careful consideration must be exercised when transitioning a trained source model to adapt to an entirely distinct environment that deviates significantly from the training set. The majority of the efforts to mitigate this issue have predominantly focused on classification and segmentation tasks. In this work, we perform a domain adaptation of a trained source model to reconstruct high-resolution intervertebral disc meshes from low-resolution MRI.
methodsTo address the outlined challenges, we use MRI2Mesh as the shape reconstruction network. It incorporates three major modules: image encoder, mesh deformation, and cross-level feature fusion. This feature fusion module is used to encapsulate local and global disc features. We evaluate two major domain adaptation techniques: adaptive batch normalization (AdaBN) and adaptive instance normalization (AdaIN) for the task of shape reconstruction.
resultsExperiments conducted on distinct datasets, including data from different populations, machines, and test sites demonstrate the effectiveness of MRI2Mesh for domain adaptation. MRI2Mesh achieved up to a 14% decrease in Hausdorff distance (HD) and a 19% decrease in the point-to-surface (P2S) metric for both AdaBN and AdaIN experiments, indicating improved performance.
conclusionMRI2Mesh has demonstrated consistent superiority to the state-of-the-art Voxel2Mesh network across a diverse range of datasets, populations, and scanning protocols, highlighting its versatility. Additionally, AdaBN has emerged as a robust method compared to the AdaIN technique. Further experiments show that MRI2Mesh, when combined with AdaBN, holds immense promise for enhancing the precision of anatomical shape reconstruction in domain adaptation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39002098What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.