Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39002090›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2024

An international delphi survey and consensus meeting to define the risk factors for ureteral stricture after endoscopic treatment for urolithiasis.

Stefano Moretto, A Saita, C M Scoffone, M Talso, B K Somani, O Traxer, O Angerri, E Liatsikos, Y Ulvik, C M Cracco and 16 more

Abstract readConsensus Statement
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. [Efficacy analysis of laparoscopy combined with flexible ureteroscope in the treatment of complex ureteral stricture].Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

Stefano MorettoDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy. stefano.moretto.ch@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3418-5202
A SaitaDepartment of Urology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Institute IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy.
C M ScoffoneDepartment of Urology, Cottolengo Hospital, Turin, Italy.
M TalsoDepartment of Urology, Luigi Sacco University Hospital, Milan, Italy.
B K SomaniDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton, UK.
O TraxerDepartment of Urology, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
O AngerriDepartment of Urology, Fundació Puigvert University Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
E LiatsikosDepartment of Urology, University Hospital of Patras, Patras, Greece.
Y UlvikDepartment of Urology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
C M CraccoDepartment of Urology, Cottolengo Hospital, Turin, Italy.
E X KellerDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
A PietropaoloDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton, UK.
T TaillyDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium.
M CorralesDepartment of Urology, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
V De ConinckDepartment of Urology, AZ Klina, Brasschaat, Belgium.
U NageleDepartment of Urology, General Hospital Hall in Tirol, Hall in Tirol, Austria.
S FerrettiDepartment of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena, Baggiovara, Italy.
P KronenbergDepartment of Urology, Hospital CUF Descobertas, Lisbon, Portugal.
L CarmignaniDepartment of Urology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
P J OstherDepartment of Urology, Lillebaelt Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark.
I K GoumasDepartment of Urology, Istituto Clinico Beato Matteo, Vigevano, Italy.
L AjayiDepartment of Urology, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
P AcquatiDepartment of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy.
D Perez-FentesDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Complex of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
T R W HerrmannDepartment of Urology, Spital Thurgau AG, Frauenfeld, Switzerland.
N M BuffiDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIatrogenic ureteral strictures (US) after endoscopic treatment for urolithiasis represent a significant healthcare concern. However, high-quality evidence on the risk factors associated with US is currently lacking. We aimed to develop a consensus statement addressing the definition, risk factors, and follow-up management of iatrogenic US after endoscopic treatment for urolithiasis.

methodsUtilizing a modified Delphi method, a steering committee developed survey statements based on a systematic literature review. Then, a two-round online survey was submitted to 25 experts, offering voting options to assess agreement levels. A consensus panel meeting was held for unresolved statements. The predetermined consensus threshold was set at 70%.

resultsThe steering committee formulated 73 statements. In the initial survey, consensus was reached on 56 (77%) statements. Following in-depth discussions and refinement of 17 (23%) statements in a consensus meeting, the second survey achieved consensus on 63 (86%) statements. This process underscored agreement on pivotal factors influencing US in endoscopic urolithiasis treatments.

conclusionsThis study provides a comprehensive list of categorized risk factors for US following endoscopic urolithiasis treatments. The objectives include enhancing uniformity in research, minimizing redundancy in outcome assessments, and effectively addressing risk factors associated with US. These findings are crucial for designing future clinical trials and guiding endoscopic surgeons in mitigating the risk of US.

Indexed as

Delphi TechniqueUreteral ObstructionUreteroscopyUrolithiasisConstriction, PathologicHumansIatrogenic DiseaseInternationalityPostoperative ComplicationsRisk FactorsEndoscopic surgeryIatrogenic ureteral injuryRisk factorsStone diseaseStone treatmentUreteral stricture

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.