ArticleEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2024
Effects of active vitamin D analogs and calcimimetic agents on PTH and bone mineral biomarkers in hemodialysis patients with SHPT: a network meta-analysis.
Article in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Model-Informed Precision Dosing of Tacrolimus: A Systematic Review of Population Pharmacokinetic Models and a Benchmark Study of Software Tools.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2024Pooled it
- Therapeutic Plasma Exchange and Changes in Calcium, Phosphate, Parathyroid Hormone, and Fibroblast Growth Factor-23.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2026Article
- [Switching patients from cinacalcet to etelcalcetide: evaluation of predictors of efficacy in a retrospective cohort study].Problemy endokrinologii · 2026Article
- Combination therapy with nutritional vitamin D and calcimimetics in secondary hyperparathyroidism: a mechanism-based approach to restoring PTH regulation.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Review
- Cinacalcet Efficacy in Hyperparathyroidism-Chronic Kidney Disease-Non-Dialysis, Hemodialysis, Peritoneal Dialysis, Kidney Transplantation: Critical Review.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Vitamin D and Vitamin D Analogues in Hemodialysis Patients: A Review of the Literature.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Association between serum phosphorus levels and pelvic bone mineral density in U.S. adults aged 18-59 years.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveActive vitamin D analogs and calcimimetic agents are primary drugs for patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism. Due to the different pharmacological mechanisms, they have different effects on the level of parathyroid hormone, serum calcium, phosphorus, and bone turnover biomarkers. This study aimed to evaluate the active vitamin D analogs and calcimimetic agents in hemodialysis patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism.
methodsWe included randomized clinical trials of hemodialysis patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism, comparing active vitamin D analogs to calcimimetic agents or placebo/control. The primary outcome was the change of PTH level from baseline to end-up. The secondary outcome was the change in serum calcium, phosphorus, calcium-phosphorus product, and bone turnover biomarkers. A network meta-analysis method was applied to complete this study. The forest plots reflected statistical differences in the outcomes between active vitamin D analogs and calcimimetic agents. The SUCRA result presented the ranking of impact on the outcomes.
resultsTwenty-one randomized clinical trials with 4653 patients were included in this network meta-analysis. Global and splitting-node inconsistencies provided no evidence of inconsistency in this study. There was no statistical difference between two active vitamin D analogs and three calcimimetic agents in the PTH, and phosphorus levels changed. Considering serum calcium level, compared with placebo, calcitriol (9.73, 3.09 to 16.38) and paricalcitol (9.74, 3.87 to 15.60) increase serum calcium. However, cinacalcet (- 1.94, - 3.72 to - 0.15) and etelcalcetide (- 7.80, - 11.80 to - 3.80) reduced the serum calcium, even a joint use of cinacalcet with active vitamin D analogs (- 5.83, - 9.73 to - 1.93). Three calcimimetic agents decreased calcium levels much more than calcitriol and paricalcitol. The same type of drugs was not distinct, with each one affecting the change in calcium level. Cinacalcet reduced calcium-phosphorus product much more than paricalcitol (- 3.66, - 6.72 to - 0.60). Evocalcet decreased calcium-phosphorus product more than cinacalcet (- 5.64, - 8.91 to - 2.37), calcitriol (- 9.36, - 14.81 to - 3.92), and paricalcitol (- 9.30, - 13.78 to - 4.82). Compared with paricalcitol, cinacalcet significantly increases the level of ALP (24.50, 23.05 to 25.95) and bALP (0.67, 0.03 to 1.31). The incidence of gastrointestinal disorders in cinacacet (29.35, 1.71 to 504.98) and etelcalcetide (20.92, 1.20 to 365.68) was notably higher than in paricalcitol. Etelcalcetide (0.71, 0.53 to 0.96) and evocalcet (0.46, 0.33 to 0.64) presented a lower rate of gastrointestinal disorders than cinacalcet. Cinacalcet ranked first in adverse gastrointestinal, nervous, and respiratory reactions.
conclusionThe same kinds of agents perform similar efficacy on the level of PTH, serum calcium, phosphorus, and calcium-phosphorus product. Paricalcitol did not lead to more hypercalcemia than calcitriol. The calcium decrease induced by cinacalcet was not settled even by associating it with active vitamin D analogs. Cinacalcet and evocalcet were superior to calcitriol and paricacitol in reducing calcium-phosphorus product. Calcimimetics induced more gastrointestinal disorders than active vitamin D analogs, especially cinacalcet.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39002024What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.